Wrong.
As it turns out, Pedro is no worse from pitches 90-120 (Couldn't find 100+ stats, but it's good enough) than he is the rest of the game. In the 2004 season:
- Code: Select all
Pitches AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB HBP SO SB CS AVG OBP SLG OPS
1-15 105 11 35 3 2 9 18 5 1 23 0 0 .333 .360 .657 1.017
16-30 116 19 17 4 1 2 7 8 3 45 2 0 .147 .220 .250 .470
31-45 108 12 28 7 1 1 12 10 5 33 6 0 .259 .344 .370 .714
46-60 115 16 29 4 1 3 16 9 2 26 3 2 .252 .313 .383 .695
61-75 120 15 29 8 1 4 10 10 2 32 4 2 .242 .308 .425 .733
76-90 116 12 28 7 2 4 10 10 1 31 3 0 .241 .305 .440 .744
91-105 91 12 17 3 0 2 12 7 2 26 0 0 .187 .248 .286 .533
106-120 41 2 10 1 0 1 5 2 0 11 1 1 .244 .279 .341 .621
He doesn't get worse; he gets better. His OPS for 90+ pitches is better than any other span, save 16-30.
2003 looks like it was a statistical anamoly for Pedro. In 2003, his 106-120 shot up to .370 average against, but in 2002 it was a mere .231. Also, from 90-105, the average against was a minscule .138, and the OPS was .471.
I am getting more and more convinced that the magic 100 number is not what it seems.
Pedro just got unlucky.

Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey






















