DK wrote:Just for the record:
A: Bonds never speaks on this recording.
B: The actual recording sounds very fake, as if it was cut and paste together, and for 90 seconds there are many holes and gaps.
C: It's a damn shame people are willing to pass judgement so quickly on Bonds.
I don't know if he's taken steroids, just like any one of you. I don't have special eyes and ears. But isn't this country founded on innocent until proven guilty?
It sickens me sometimes.
Aren't I entitled to my own opinion though? Thats what this country is founded on, too. This is a bad anology, but OJ was innocent. Do you think he is?
A. You are entitled to your opinion. I can't mess with your free will. But that doesn't mean it's right. That's the whole point of an opinion based on unknown information- Once the information comes out, the opinion is proven to be right or wrong. No information has come out, so I must stick with innocent until proven guilty.
B. From what I've heard, it sounds like OJ is
guilty, but again, I'm not a prosecutor on this case. I'm not OJ. Like I said before, I don't have special eyes and ears.
I haven't had enough of a chance to look at the OJ evidence, mainly because OJ's not someone I especially care about.