I would like to hear you guys discuss your opinions concerning whether or not a contact hitter is more beneficial to his team than someone who strikes out much more often than making contact. Some say that there no difference and you gidp too much if you're a contact hitter and others say that it allows for more productive out if you can make contact. What do u say? Discuss
there could be a little difference a strikeout could add momentum to a pitchers attitude so he would start throwing better i dunno just came up with something there
fgfdsgdsfdasfd
"Hey honey, ya think KFC's still open"-Will Ferrell
Mark my words: Oliver Perez will be 2005 NL Cy Young Winner
Rico The Retard
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 5820
Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Bases this season: 0
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The Magical Valley Of Love And Happiness
A K is a little worse than an out by contact but not to the degree Tim McCarver would have you believe. It's very situational but putting a ball into play is almost always better than striking out. Just ask Red Sox fans what can happen when a ball is put in play.
Maine has a good swing for a pitcher but on anything that moves, he has no chance. And if it's a fastball, it has to be up in the zone. Basically, the pitcher has to hit his bat. - Mike Pelfrey
runner at third, one out.
I'd rather have a contact hitter get a ground ball to the right side than a hitter K.
runner on first, noone out
I'd rather have a hitter K than ground into a double play.
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day, teach a man to fish and he'll drown because you forgot to teach him to swim.
[url=http://www.indra.com/8ball/front.html]Invaluable Fantasy Baseball Resource[/url]
And let me clarify this before I go on: I think K's are terrible ways to make outs, but, if a team has a weak bullpen and it's a close game, you might want to have a long at bat by avoiding swinging at the first few strikes. It puts you in a tough position with 2 strikes, but also forces the pitcher to get more tired.
That's why K pitchers like Schmidt throw so many pitches, but finesse guys like Halladay hardly throw any. K's are much more tiring. I'd still rather have a guy make contact than strikeout, but it's a strategy that can be considered (I do it in MVP for XBox and it works to some degree. Being extra patient when you're facing an awesome pitcher, that is).
But if you're talking about which kind of hitter you'd rather hve, I'd rather have the contact hitter, all things equal. That way you can still be patient and force the pitcher to throw more pitches, but have a better shot at avoiding a strikeout at the same time.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."
well, doesnt it kinda depend on how good the hitters are... *tongue scratches his useless fantasy baseball obsessed head*
anyways, i agree depends on the situation.
my ideal hitter would be the Barry Bonds/Pujols type.. ya know... people who have more walks than K's.
I don't mind someone who strikes out a lot, as long as he draws walks as well. but someone like soriano makes me a lil nervous.
[size=10]Manny Ramirez....$20 million
Pedro Martinez....$17.5 million
Curt Schilling...$12 million (and a $2 million bonus)
Never hearing a Yankee fan chant 1918 again...priceless. [/size]