LBJackal wrote:I saw this movie and personally, I thought it was horrible. Not enough action, too much of a love story. There was way too much filler, too much of the grandma and uninteresting trials and tribulations of Peter chasing M.J. If you're the emotional type that gets teary-eyed at movies, I guess this was for you. I'm surprised that the 95% male population in here enjoyed it so much
I'd have rather seen "The English Patient"........or even "Sack Lunch" for that matter. Biggest waste of $10 I can recall.......and I saw "Mean Girls" not too long ago............
this is the only response I would expect from LBJackal. lol. Anyways of course the movie is going to be on the corny side, everyone forgets it is a superhero movie, and superhero stories/movies are corny.
Spider-Man 2 was EVERYTHING I hoped it would be, AWESOME. It was wroth being one of the first to see it at midnite the night before it came out.
If you didn't know Im a spiderman fan, well, you should have, after reading my signature for the last 6 months.
There we go, at least somebody didn't think it was the greatest movie ever. LOL. Just because it was big budget with a few special effects (I admit, the guy with 4 arms was cool) doesn't mean it's a good movie.
X-Men, X2 and The Punisher were much more entertaining. This movie was similar to "Under the Tuscan Sun" with a few action scenes and a bunch of corny lines.
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."
LBJackal wrote:There we go, at least somebody didn't think it was the greatest movie ever. LOL. Just because it was big budget with a few special effects (I admit, the guy with 4 arms was cool) doesn't mean it's a good movie.
X-Men, X2 and The Punisher were much more entertaining. This movie was similar to "Under the Tuscan Sun" with a few action scenes and a bunch of corny lines.
X-Men X2 and espiecally the Punisher all lacked likable, well- developed characters. Those action sequences were less entertaining and the direction was a lot less organized (I do admit, I normally like the director who did the X Men movies . Bryan Singer I believe? Directed Usual Suspects!!) Spiderman 2 is no Oscar winner, however it is certianly worth your $8.50. Comparing it to Under the Tuscan Sun (2 hours of hell) is ludacris.
On a slightly seperate note, I spent the last 8 hours playing the video game Spiderman 2. Great, great, fun.
"I'm going to meet the greatest umpire of all, and he knows I'm innocent."
Yeah, Under the Tuscan Sun was a waste of 2 hours, which is why I compared it to Spider-Man 2. I can see if people like the dramatic, love story type of movies, then both films could be appealing. I'll paraphrase Peter Griffin on how Under the Tuscan Sun was though: "Destiny. It was her destiny. There, I just saved you 2 long boobless hours."
At least Spider-Man 2 had the requisite wet t-shirt scene with Kirsten Dunst. If she wasn't so weird looking it might have made the movie worth the $10 I paid
"Jack, will you call me, if you're able?"
"I've got your phone number written, in the back of my Bible."
LBJackal wrote:Yeah, Under the Tuscan Sun was a waste of 2 hours, which is why I compared it to Spider-Man 2. I can see if people like the dramatic, love story type of movies, then both films could be appealing. I'll paraphrase Peter Griffin on how Under the Tuscan Sun was though: "Destiny. It was her destiny. There, I just saved you 2 long boobless hours."
At least Spider-Man 2 had the requisite wet t-shirt scene with Kirsten Dunst. If she wasn't so weird looking it might have made the movie worth the $10 I paid
Lol, yeah I'm not sure what was going on with Kirsten Dunst, but I found her strangley unattractive.
And is Under the Tuscan Sun the first movie Diane Lane did keep her bra on?!
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
"I'm going to meet the greatest umpire of all, and he knows I'm innocent."