stacking teams (is this an old thread??) - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

stacking teams (is this an old thread??)

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

stacking teams (is this an old thread??)

Postby agchris02 » Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:40 am

Our league is having a discussion on the value of stacking your team with players from one team (primarily yankess and/or rangers)

for instance, one team in our league has:
arod (1st rd)
shef (2nd rd)
moose (3rd rd)
jeter (4th rd)
rivera (via trade of dotel and griffey)

OR

soriano
blalock
young
cordero
rogers

obviously the yanks are better, but the majority opinion in the league is that stacking your team, no matter how good of players you are is dumb (in a H2H league, completely differant argument if its a roto league) because if the yanks or rangers go cold, your whole team sucks, the other side is, how often do those offenses go cold and for how long?

Any opinions, stats that have already been run on this?
Jackalope
agchris02
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1562
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Dallas Tx

Postby beltrans_boy » Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:44 am

I've got Rolen, Renteria and Edmonds from the Red Birds. If I could get Pujols, I would. I'm in a H2H league. When these guys are "cold", sure it can be a little painful...but you'll be hardpressed to find a day when all 4 are having 0-fers. When everything is clicking, and the Cardinals score 10-15 runs, it's a thing of beauty. One of those games can singlehandedly win an entire week for me. Also, whenever there is a Monday game, you get an extra 10-12 ABs that week...which can make a huge difference.

Anyway, that's my take.
[size=10]"Men are apt to mistake the strength of their feeling for the strength of their argument." [/size]
beltrans_boy
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 3092
Joined: 15 Apr 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: crusing down the street in my six-fo'

Postby agchris02 » Tue Jun 29, 2004 1:48 am

yeah theres another potential:

pujols
rolen
edmonds
renteria
morris
isringhausen
carpenter

boston fans ... sorry nomar manny pedro,good threesome, but not a complete stack (plus nomar is a whiny turd who doesnt deserve an allstar vote, much less a starting spot....but thats another topic)
Jackalope
agchris02
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1562
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Dallas Tx

Postby DEF » Tue Jun 29, 2004 3:09 am

agchris02 wrote:yeah theres another potential:

pujols
rolen
edmonds
renteria
morris
isringhausen
carpenter

boston fans ... sorry nomar manny pedro,good threesome, but not a complete stack (plus nomar is a whiny turd who doesnt deserve an allstar vote, much less a starting spot....but thats another topic)


Boston not a team you can stack?!?

Manny
Nomar
Pedro
Schilling
Foulke
Ortiz

and even Varitek is one of the better catching options out there, plus Damon and Nixon are roster-worthy in virtually any format

Just a little more than a threesome to choose from.

P.S. This is from a Boston fan who can't stand Nomar.

Also, to the overall idea of stacking. I have no problem with it, even in head-to-head leagues. I wouldn't set out specially to do it. But you should always take the best players available. If you end up with a bunch from the same team, so be it. You still have the best players you could have, and their overall numbers will make up for the occasional day they run into a pitcher throwing a gem or some lost stats to a rainout.
"I'm telling ya, he jumped us. Gloves off, stick down, no warning. He challenged the Chiefs. Called us names. But Dave was there."

"Dave's a killer."

"Yeah, Dave's a killer."

"Dave's a mess."
DEF
College Coach
College Coach

User avatar

Posts: 309
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Boston

Postby kaz » Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:13 pm

Houston also

Beltran
Berkman
Kent
Bags
Clemens
Oswalt
Lidge
"They invented the All-Star Game for Willie Mays." -Ted Williams
kaz
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar
Sweet 16 Survivor
Posts: 839
Joined: 10 Mar 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby monybaggs » Tue Jun 29, 2004 12:19 pm

on observation....If your 2003 fantasy team was comprised of ALL Boston Redsox, and you managed your lineup exactly like Grady did....you would have beat 95% of fantasy lineups. I came in 1st last year and trailed the Redsox in every cat except SB's

just to be devils advocate on your point
monybaggs
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor

User avatar

Posts: 50
Joined: 6 May 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: The Nation

Postby Toe Jam » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:20 pm

Yeah, I stacked my team with Expos. It hasn't really worked out for me. 8-o
Toe Jam
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor


Posts: 38
Joined: 21 Jun 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby Ajax » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:21 pm

My argument against stacking a fantasy roster from players of one team wouldn't really be based on whether or not a team went "hot" or "cold". As it's been pointed out, hot and cold streaks would even out over the season. Also, you've got exactly the same chance of 5 players from the same team going cold at once, as you do of 5 players from different teams going cold at once.

My reasoning for not loading up on players from one team has to do with injuries. It's bad enough losing one of your starters to injury, but it's even worse if his absence is affecting a bunch of your other fantasy players in real life.

It's not a perfect example, but take Halladay, Delgado, and Wells. If you had all three, your team would be hurting bad enough without Delgado and Wells, but now Halladay has lost some run support also.
Ajax
College Coach
College Coach

User avatar

Posts: 188
Joined: 18 Feb 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Postby John Bonzo » Tue Jun 29, 2004 2:55 pm

DEF wrote:
Boston not a team you can stack?!?

Manny
Nomar
Pedro
Schilling
Foulke
Ortiz

and even Varitek is one of the better catching options out there, plus Damon and Nixon are roster-worthy in virtually any format

Just a little more than a threesome to choose from.


I agree...Boston may be the most all-around "stackable" team
John Bonzo
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1285
Joined: 27 Jan 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Houston, TX

Postby ajgnydc722 » Tue Jun 29, 2004 3:00 pm

Boston is definately stackable but I don't see having all of their players as being better than having all Yankee or Astro players but that's my opinion.
Image
ajgnydc722
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 4067
Joined: 11 May 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: THE EMPIRE

Next

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: buiviopaufamp and 11 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Monday, Sep. 1
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Philadelphia at Atlanta
(1:10 pm)
NY Mets at Miami
(1:10 pm)
indoors
Boston at Tampa Bay
(1:10 pm)
indoors
Minnesota at Baltimore
(1:35 pm)
Pittsburgh at St. Louis
(2:15 pm)
Milwaukee at Chi Cubs
(2:20 pm)
Seattle at Oakland
(4:05 pm)
Detroit at Cleveland
(4:05 pm)
San Francisco at Colorado
(4:10 pm)
Arizona at San Diego
(4:10 pm)
Texas at Kansas City
(8:10 pm)
Washington at LA Dodgers
(8:10 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact