This is the first time I've ever seen something like this happen, so help me out here, it's causing quite a controversy in our league.
Two teams agreed on a trade, Team A's owner is busy a lot and doesn't have time to keep up to date on a lot of things (like player status/injuries)...the trade was:
Team A gets:
Team B gets:
I didn't post this in the trade forum, b/c I'm not asking whether or not the trade is vetoable. The trade made it through the waiting period with 3 vetos (needed 5), and was supposed to go through. Rather than the trade going through, we noticed the trade just disappeared from Yahoo's system (we later determined it was because Team A was trying to drop a player on his DL in order to avoid having too many players).
So now the trade is accepted again, but in the meantime, the relatively inactive Team A owner has posted saying he has changed his mind about the trade and would rather not do it because of Cameron and Borowski's status, and he would have posted this before it went through the first time after he found out about Cameron's injury and Borowski's suckiness but he was getting married and had no access to a computer (and this is true).
However, am I right in saying that because the trade technically made it through the waiting period without being vetoed the first time, then we shouldn't be able to vote again on it? There are a lot of owners who want it cancelled now after hearing Team A saying he doesn't want it anymore, and it's pretty obvious he's getting the short end of the deal.
If you need me to clarify something, just ask...thanks in advance.