Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **jbones733** » Fri May 07, 2004 5:55 pm

you can have a guy eligible at a position who doesent play there all year , but a guy has to play 15 games at a new position before eligible, it should be AT LEAST 10 if not less. even guys who you know are gonna be there all year have to wait, retarted (END YAHOO RANT)

by **Amazinz** » Fri May 07, 2004 5:59 pm

Well the part about a player being eligible in a position we all know he is no longer going to play is true in every league I have participated in. I don't have a problem with that but I do agree with you that the 15 game requirement is a bit stiff.

by **LBJackal** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:00 pm

I like Yahoo's requirements. If they didn't do it this way, there would be chaos. I see nothing wrong with it.

by **Amazinz** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:04 pm

Heh I don't think lowering the eligibility requirements to ten would cause chaos but to each his own. :-D

by **LBJackal** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:10 pm

Not just lowering them. But he's saying if a guy doesn't play a position, he shouldn't qualify there. If they took away a player's eligibility mid-season, or even in the off-season after he played there all season, it would cause chaos for keeper leagues. Maybe 10 games would be better, but I like 15. Too many players qualifying for every position screws everything up. I like one main position per player.

by **jpbusta** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:12 pm

Oh I just realized that Huff finally became 3b eligible. :-D

by **BGbootha** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:14 pm

I like Yahoo's requirements, although i like the idea of making it 10 instead of the 15 that it is now.

But i would have to say that eligibility is the least of Yahoo's problems.

by **Chopper** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:15 pm

jpbusta wrote:Oh I just realized that Huff finally became 3b eligible.

Awesome! Now he can get me an oh-fer-four at three different positions!

by **beltrans_boy** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:16 pm

jbones733 wrote:it should be AT LEAST 10

It is at least 10. It's 15.

by **Amazinz** » Fri May 07, 2004 6:18 pm

LBJackal wrote:Not just lowering them. But he's saying if a guy doesn't play a position, he shouldn't qualify there. If they took away a player's eligibility mid-season, or even in the off-season after he played there all season, it would cause chaos for keeper leagues. Maybe 10 games would be better, but I like 15. Too many players qualifying for every position screws everything up. I like one main position per player.

Got it, misread what you were saying. I agree.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Yahoo requirments are thee worst !!

Yahoo requirments are thee worst !!

Re: Yahoo requirments are thee worst !!

Who is online