Wait a second here. This is exactly what was said.
CubsFan7724 wrote:Remember the part were i said they were probably both drunk? Also i didnt say capping the guy was right, I just said he may have a reason in the court of law for blowing him away.
Being drunk is not a reason, a defense, or an excuse in a court of law. Except for some states that say that if you're so intoxicated that you didn't consciously know what you're doing you can make that defense.
And the killer can't claim self-defense because it was the driver who was being attacked. (If the article is correct.) The killer is looking at some time...
Bluto: Over? Did you say over? NOTHING is over until WE decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? HELL, NO!
Boon: Forget it, he's rolling.