by Base Ballpickers » Fri Apr 23, 2004 11:05 am
dunn is younger, powerful, and developing into a patient hitter. In the last 9 years, Dye has only reached 400 or more at bats 3 times. His average has declined every year since 2000 which is the only year he EVER hit .300 or higher. I would take dye if I could get him, but if I had to choose between dunn or dye...well, you already know that. I don't think dye's past allows me to believe that he will be around the whole year.
"My job as a coach is to make you do what you don't want to do so you can become the man you want to be."