Roto or H2H Scoring

[afromangettindrunk]

I just want to pretend I'm managing a big league team.

true that

[bestinwest]

I like them both, preferably h2h but they are both fun thats why i have a leage of both type scoring, roster churning is good idea by the way

[Zito is God]

Prefer head to head, makes me feel like I am facing real teams.

[ondeckb]

I like Roto better, because it measures your whole season, not just a single week at a time. it is a better measure of how good your team is.

Why would you be surprised....H2H is MUCH more like real baseball....there are no points in baseball.

[Danimal]

I like both, but the intensity of an auction draft is great. Combine that with trading players with attached dollar values in a keeper league is almost euphoric.

[thetongueofire]

i like both and in my mind i don't think there is a clear winner but Roto does reflect the quality of your team more truly..... Roto is for Billy Beane fans and H2H is for Dusty Baker fans

[kentx12]

H2H for me, but I am a roster churner, which is not to popular with most fantasy players.

As I said earlier I like H2H but roster churning is the same as cheating in my opinion. H2H is no fun unless there are limits on innings pitched.

[NY Yankees Fan 2004]

I do both but I like Roto better. I like H2H in every sport except for baseball. I feal with H2H you just don't really have enough time to get involved in a matchup. Especially with Pitchers. You only get 1 outing a week or 2 if You are lucky.

[waffle_prince]

Roster churning renders the point of playing h2h rather meaningless, at least in regards to the reasons I enjoy h2h. Also, in my public yahoo league last year, someone churned, and he lost. In my public hockey league that just wrapped up a couple weeks ago, there was a guy who churned and I beat him easily. Obviously that's a small sample size, but I've never seen a roster churner win. I don't think it's fundamentally sound.