I'm not a fan of either of these trades to be honest. But I by default don't like trades that involve more players than I can count on one hand. However...
Honestly you're trading so many players in both trades that both trades make sense. I think I like the first one better, you don't have to give up much to get Crawford/Alvarez who both have really good value in deep leagues. But, I'm a Crawford believer, he could just as easily get hurt.
I'm not a fan of the 2nd trade...for such a deep league you're giving up a lot of young talent.
Hey. Sorry for the late reply. I was out of the country. I think that I liked the original deal a little better as well. Gets a little messy with all of these players involved. Although Kershaw is a stud pitcher, you just might lose a little long term depth with the new deal.
I like the first offer better than the second as well, but I don't think I would do either. I would try to put another package together if the guy is anxious to make a trade. I'm not really sold on either of those options. Just my .02.
Losing Zobrist and his multi position eligibility might sting, but you are getting a real nice haul back. I prefer the first deal then the second cause you wouldn't lose two nice guys (Cain & Simmons) at cheap deals.
But the second offer is not to bad, your getting a stud ACE for $25 in Weaver, to team up with Cain already in your rotation.
The only one I'd be inclined to accept is his very first offer.
61* 70**73**762*** MVP****NL11,AL07,AL05,NL04,ALNL03,ALNL02,NL01,ALNL00,AL99,ALNL98,ALNL96 RIP Cammi Cmon Bud, NOW is the time to sack up and force feed an Olympic style drug program down Fehr's fat throat. Save OUR game from these blatant cheaters!