Need help with my last 2 keepers; Bruce, Tulo or Bats? WHIR

[beisbol4ever94928]

Tulo is worth the gamble, Bautista would be my next choice simply because you have a good chance to get Bruce back int he draft where you wouldn't with Bautista.

Help with mine, please? viewtopic.php?f=26&t=453640

[plamb23]

I echo the echo of their echo.......Tulo and Bats are worth the risk.

[jtsandwich]

Bats and Tulo for sure.

Why you ask, because they are the 2 that will give you the most perceived value with all other teams. What I mean by this is that you can always trade them for the most value in return. Owners fall into name recognition based on the productivity of a player over "x" amount of years. Hot rookies like Trout and Harper have perceived value off the charts and its based off of 1 yr for Trout and the late teen years of Harper, now you can't hardly trade for them. So you keep the injury guys like Tulo, and only recently Bats, and then when they start out hot the 1st 2 weeks you get then up on the block and go after a few guys that may be under performing. Do this always and your team will improve. Sell high and buy low! I do it at least 3 times every year.

[jackie hayes]

Tulo for certain. Like everyone else, I'd go with Bautista for the second spot. I get the age argument for Bruce, but the production gap is too big, imo.