Bat Boy 42 wrote:GiantsFan14 wrote:ayebatter wrote:
As wary as Washington was with going over 160 innings, and if the "proper" progression is an increase of 30 innings for young arms, then I don't think Strass will be #1 with 190 innings, if he does however reach the kind of innings Kershaw should get - 220, then he has a fair chance.
I kinda doubt they'll limit him next year.
Doubt you should. Do you really think the Nats front office will let him go near 220 IP? I wouldn't bet on it.
I don't think he'd hit 220 even if he wasn't limited. He doesn't go deep enough into games. He'll get his 32 starts.