Dee Gordon or JJ Hardy

[baseballfanTigers]

I have Dee Gordon on my team. Should I trade for Hardy? Do you think Hardy will turn it around and raise his average a little?

[moochieh]

Usually when you have Dee, it is strictly for the speed. I wouldn't be able to comment fairly without seeing if you can take the hit there. Generally I would say I am not the biggest Hardy fan. I think Gordon was removed from the game yesterday but I'm not sure what it was.

Help here please? viewtopic.php?t=449880

Edit: here is what I saw:
Dee Gordon was replaced at shortstop heading to the top of the ninth in Sunday's game against the Mets.Gordon, who had three steals tonight, appeared to tweak something running out a grounder in the bottom of the eighth. He's probably just day-to-day, but his owners should stay tuned for an update. Jul 1 - 11:07 PM

[siugrad30]

I've always like Dee so I'd stick with him over Hardy. I think Hardy does offer some average potential but he can be a streaky hitter. I like the Gordon's direction as of late and if his injury is minor, there's no reason to move on another SS.

[SecretAgentMan]

Hardy. Avg will be mediocre at best but he will hit for power at a thin position. Gordon does nothing but steal bases and make errors.

[MadDog36]

Depends: this comes down to needs. I would do whatever you NEED. Its easier to get speed. There are guys like Quentin Berry, Rajai Davis, even Tony Campana (when he plays...) for speed....

In a vacuum I'd go with Hardy, but if you NEED speed and can't get any from FFA i'd stick with Gordon I guess.

[redkanefox2009]

I would agree with MadDog. If you really value speed, then I would stick with him. If it's not a big need for you or if you get get some off the waiver wire, go with Hardy. I just dropped Gordon in my league, I was tired of pulling my hair out starting him, and I'd rather take the hit on one category than have him ruin all my others.

Help with mine please? viewtopic.php?f=26&t=449934