Veto Worthy Yes/No WHIR

[rjlmets]

My league is going nuts because of this trade and calling me out on collusion.

Keeper League:

I give: David Freese and AJ Pierzinski
I get: Adrian Gonzalez

I think this is fair and 2 people are going ballistic. Please help

[jtwise]

Though I think you got clearly the better side of the deal, I don't think I would consider this veto-worthy

Thanks for the help on mine

[metsfan33]

no. depends on what you need. what is your team now?

[wazzeus]

Frankly, the side you're giving up is the better side. No way should people be whining.

[mcmbpd]

Veto? That's ridiculous...you clearly get the better side of that deal in my mind but I don't think its so unfair that ppl should be whining about it. People should be able to make whatever trades they want to make imo...bad ones or good ones. If ppl make bad decisions then that's on them...it shouldn't be up to the rest of the league to legislate what deals are good and bad, that totally defeats the purpose. If ppl were making obviously ridiculous trades like Mariano Rivera for Kemp, Trout, Miggy, and Clutch...or just dumping their team so somebody else could pick them up to win then yeah, that needs to be prevented. Otherwise its buyer beware when it comes to making deals.

Please help with mine thanks

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=449130

[AlecAdvice]

You got better side. But Veto worthy let alone collusion whining? Absolutely No.

[surista]

No way is this veto-worthy.

The guys going nuts about collusion are insane.

Help me out on my trade question!
viewtopic.php?t=449156

[justhangin]

No. In my league I got Agon for a pair of average closers.

[kaiser]

You did very well there, but it is not a completely unreasonable trade. Lopsided, yes. Veto-able, no.

[wazzeus]

You did very well there, but it is not a completely unreasonable trade. Lopsided, yes. Veto-able, no.

How is it lopsided in favor of A-Gone? Freese has been far superior, and at a thinner position ... and Pierzynski is posting All-Star starter-caliber numbers.