How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP?? - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2015 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Re: How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Postby Ender » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:14 pm

jorgesca wrote:LD rates are nowhere included in SIERA right? I think it includes GB rate and FB rate and I'd love one stat that included the 3 of them. Something like FIP but where BABIP included these 3 things.


I think they leave out LD% because the year to year correlation is really low, it is 0.40 only.
Ender
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

CafeholicFantasy Expert
Posts: 7733
Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Postby Skin Blues » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:28 pm

If using LD% made an improvement, I'm sure it would have already been included. A quick google search shows that LD% only has a 0.11 correlation from year to year, versus GB% and FB% which have Y2Y correlations of .85 and 0.81 respectively. That means incorporating LD% probably does more harm than good, and explains the omission.
Skin Blues
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 3082
(Past Year: 110)
Joined: 11 Apr 2010
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Postby Ender » Thu Apr 26, 2012 3:45 pm

Yeah what he said, LD was listed at 0.40, didn't notice it was missing the % so I gave the wrong number.
Ender
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

CafeholicFantasy Expert
Posts: 7733
Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Postby jorgesca » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:06 pm

[quote="Skin Blues"]If using LD% made an improvement, I'm sure it would have already been included. A quick google search shows that [url=http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/2012/1/9/2690405/what-starting-pitcher-metrics-correlate-year-to-year]LD% only has a 0.11 correlation from year to year[/url], versus GB% and FB% which have Y2Y correlations of .85 and 0.81 respectively. That means incorporating LD% probably does more harm than good, and explains the omission.[/quote]

Yeah I'm sure it would have already been included, and as a predictor of future ERA this might be better, but should it be included when analyzing past performance? a year worth of performance? I think a year worth of data on balls in play with a higher than usual LD% and a higher than usual BABIP would just indicate that his stuff was just not good and it was hit hard, not that he had bad luck. Just some random thoughts, I always feel something is missing in all of these statistics.
jorgesca
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 102
Joined: 11 Apr 2007
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: How much should we really be looking at FIP and xFIP??

Postby Ender » Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:43 pm

LD% fluctuates wildly year to year, you need a good 4 or 5 year sample for it to mean very much. That is why it shows such a small year to year correlation.
Ender
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

CafeholicFantasy Expert
Posts: 7733
Joined: 30 Apr 2004
Home Cafe: Baseball

Previous

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact