by converge241 » Fri Apr 20, 2012 10:34 am
I dont see the problem with it
Howard is very risky right now, but sure has big potential when he returns
two closers coming with him and again depending on your viewpoint saves are very valuable or can be replaced easily on wire at times (and Putz gets hurt and some people thing Jansen will steal job)
Ian Kennedy is either a constant 21 game winning cy young vote getter or a fluke/recurring injury risk as he used to deal with
Teheran is either a potential future ace or just another kid who flames out
Theres more than enough risk/reward/value balance to make this totally non vetoable
is every complaining owner arguing one way? That the vet got the better end of it? On the spot I cant tell you which side id rather have more so that really screams non issue to me (with some more time i could pick a side sure but still nowhere close to a veto).
Hang tough in there with the complainers
"I'm the man with the ball. I'm the man who can throw it faster than F***. So that's why I'm better than anyone in the world." - Kenny Powers