Tex and Liriano for Putz and Davis (vetoable?)

[MadDog36]

Ok in a 7x7 keeper league:

Would you veto:
Mark Teixiera and Francisco Liriano
for
Ike Davis and J.J. Putz.

We count XBH/H/K/9/OBP extra cats.
I can't believe Tex is worth way more. Liriano's value is flat. Ike Davis value is IMO neglible and Putz is a solid closer but I mean seriously....PUtz for Liriano kinda cancels each other out and then to get no upgrade anywhere else. If the Putz side were getting a top prospect like Harper etc I wouldn't object.

[lilfrier]

I would certainly not call this vetoable. I don't know why you think Ike had no value when he's clearly capable of .270 with 25-30 homers, but that's your opinion. Closers hold too much value in fantasy, without question, but Liriano is proving himself useless more and more, so I'd rather have Putz.

[GiantsFan14]

bad trade but not vetoable. i pretty much won't veto a trade unless it's clear collusion.

[pungent]

bad trade but not vetoable. i pretty much won't veto a trade unless it's clear collusion.

Agree with the above statement. Unless it's clear collusion as stated above, who is the commish to determine where other teams put there value at...

[lane_anasazi2]

Maybe the guy trading Tex thinks he's just about done, and in 2-3 years Davis will be objectively better. In a long-term keeper league that's a risky, but not insane thought process. This kind of trade is exactly why I hate the veto system... other managers imposing their own views of players onto my team.

[raiders_umpire]

Pretty vetoable to me and I don't even like Tex for this year. Veto or not to veto would depend on how well I know the two owners and how long the league has been active.

[lotsofluck]

I agree with most of the guys above that it is not vetoable. But, as a Mets fan I am bias toward Ike.

[MaudDib]

bad trade but not vetoable. i pretty much won't veto a trade unless it's clear collusion.

I could make a case for this. Especially if the guy think Davis is going to take a step foward this year. Tex is old and likely to regress over the next few years and Liriano is just plain unownable.

[Urban Cohorts]

While I would much rather have the Tex side of the deal, I would not veto this. Ike Davis was having a fine season before his injury, so maybe the owner receiving him thinks he is going to play a whole season at that level. Liriano is garbage and Putz is serviceable.

I would not veto this. I would try to make trades with the guys giving up Tex though

[MaudDib]

I would not veto this. I would try to make trades with the guys giving up Tex though