Garza/Napoli

[warner892001]

Matt Garza for Mike Napoli

which side of this deal would you rather have?

[bigguy1551]

i have to vote for Napoli. Power/Avg hitting catchers are extremely rare. Garza, while a very good pitcher, Napoli is cream of the crop.

[GiantsFan14]

Napoli by a mile.

[MashinSpuds]

I like them both, but Garza is on the Cubs and, aside from a good strikeout total, is one of many that can provide his statistics. Napoli is a rare power-wielding catcher. Napoli is a better fantasy contributor.

[Urban Cohorts]

Napoli over Garza

[warner892001]

I didnt say- I also have Carlos Santana and need the pitching. Would you still keep Napoli?

[Urban Cohorts]

I didnt say- I also have Carlos Santana and need the pitching. Would you still keep Napoli?

I'd imagine someone would be willing to deal you more for Napoli than Garza.

[warner892001]

straight up, no

I tried for Hamels, Bumgarner, Verlander (wishful thinking), Latos etc..

teams are too attached to their players and so you have to take what you can get.

[Urban Cohorts]

straight up, no

I tried for Hamels, Bumgarner, Verlander (wishful thinking), Latos etc..

teams are too attached to their players and so you have to take what you can get.

Well if that is the case. Since you have Santana, is there anyway you can get Garza + a draft pick upgrade for Napoli? That would be reasonable..

[ensanimal]

so you have to take what you can get.

No you don't.

Napoli can be plugged in at 1B pr Util as well. His value is much higher than Garza's. No need to dump someone just because it's all you can get. Hold onto Napoli and enjoy the offensive production.