That trade is perfectly fine, Which way was the veto even being considered? Was it sour grapes over Holliday (he really isn't all that far ahead of Jones and much older) or was the concern over the guy adding a second first round pick which is probably more like player #35-40 rather than #49 being some teams will end up with more than 4 keepers in the top 48 on their rosters.
61* 70**73**762*** MVP****NL11,AL07,AL05,NL04,ALNL03,ALNL02,NL01,ALNL00,AL99,ALNL98,ALNL96 RIP Cammi Cmon Bud, NOW is the time to sack up and force feed an Olympic style drug program down Fehr's fat throat. Save OUR game from these blatant cheaters!
It's not vetoable. If I were the guy giving up Holliday, there's no way I accept it, but this isn't cheap or anything. It's two top 50 players (Adam Jones + the top 50 draft pick) for a top 20 player. It's not crazy or anything.
(In reference to an Aaron Hill for David Price swap)
mpieco wrote: You're my new hero if that gets accepted.