Although it doesnt look like a good trade im not sure its vetoeable. Gordon has had a good year but i think the guy is selling high and buyin low on nathan and hughes and i also think they both have a huge 2nd half. i also think hanson cant match those numbers in the 2nd half and heyward's soph slump continues.But this is by far not a veteoable trade.You have to let managers manage,if theres no cheating then u cant veto in my opinion.Let managers screw up their own team but im willing to bet the guy getting the 4 players wins this by seasons end.even if you disagree,come back at the end of the season and check the stats.hughes has a new power curve ball an nathan as a closer cant just be discarded.
"If you sit down at a poker game and don't see a sucker, get up. You're the sucker."
- Paul Newman (?)
bears2 wrote:Although it doesnt look like a good trade im not sure its vetoeable. Gordon has had a good year but i think the guy is selling high and buyin low on nathan and hughes and i also think they both have a huge 2nd half. i also think hanson cant match those numbers in the 2nd half and heyward's soph slump continues.But this is by far not a veteoable trade.You have to let managers manage,if theres no cheating then u cant veto in my opinion.Let managers screw up their own team but im willing to bet the guy getting the 4 players wins this by seasons end.even if you disagree,come back at the end of the season and check the stats.hughes has a new power curve ball an nathan as a closer cant just be discarded.
Some people value getting a little more quantity than quality. It's lopsided in my opinion, but look at it this way.
Several candidates to produce for Heyward (iffy this year) and Hanson (who, as a pitcher, can be replaced easier than a batter)...
By the end of the year, the "losing end" of the trade may be a winner. I don't believe it should be vetoed or reversed. Let everyone manage their way. Who knows? They could be a genius at year's end.
As for how I see it, it is tilted one way, but it's not grand theft or anything.
First Year-First Team
Rank: 1 of 12 (+/- 0) Last Week: 9-2-0 Overall: 141-80-10 (16-5 by the week)
I'd much rather be getting Hanson/Heyward but Heyward is starting to slip into that "more hype than substance" category, and is a little brittle to boot. So not vetoable esp with Gordon playing well.
Team A wins, and it's one of the more one-sided deals I've ever seen.
Heyward has still not put all his tools together to be the player we all think he can be, but for a keeper league, he still has tremendous value.
Hanson is a future (current) ace.
Tomlin, Nathan, Gordon, and Hughes?
Keeper-wise, I guess Hughes has some value, but no where near Hanson. Gordon has some value, and is certainly out-performing Heyward in a big way right now, but in the future? I doubt it. The other two are just spare parts.
(In reference to an Aaron Hill for David Price swap)
twinkypoop wrote:
mpieco wrote: You're my new hero if that gets accepted.
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by billycent » Wed Jul 13, 2011 8:48 pm 
