Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by ToddMB875 » Wed May 25, 2011 9:09 am
this trade was accepted in my league
my view was that Alex Gordon/Tommy Hanson was just not enough to land Longoria...thought they could add a little more to the trade so I vetoed it!
-
ToddMB875
- College Coach

- Posts: 267
- Joined: 5 Jun 2007
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by jpbusta » Wed May 25, 2011 9:33 am
I would take Longoria over Hanson/Gordon all day. However I'm not sure if it's veto material.
Longoria's been cold at the plate and Hanson and Gordon have been excellent so far this season.
Unfair but not veto material imo. Extreme case of selling low and buying high.

R2C2.
-
jpbusta
- General Manager


- Posts: 2988
- Joined: 19 Mar 2004
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: West Lafayette
by ToddMB875 » Wed May 25, 2011 10:38 am
well I just dont value Gordon...yes he's played well for a month...but most of his career has been a complete dud...Hanson I'll give is a top of the line pitcher...I just said the deal needs to be a little more juicy on the gordon/hanson side!
-
ToddMB875
- College Coach

- Posts: 267
- Joined: 5 Jun 2007
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by ToddMB875 » Wed May 25, 2011 11:39 am
ok talked me into it...I swapped the players on the teams...thus allowing the trade
-
ToddMB875
- College Coach

- Posts: 267
- Joined: 5 Jun 2007
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by bigoz89 » Wed May 25, 2011 2:45 pm
That was the right move Todd. It isn't a terrible trade, although I would never make it myself, unless getting longo! ha1 It definitely is not collusion so you have to let it through.
-
bigoz89
- College Coach

- Posts: 195
- (Past Year: 9)
- Joined: 15 Oct 2004
- Bases this season: 22
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: dannahann and 8 guests