My Danks/M. Reynolds for F. Francisco/E. Jackson? WHIR

[sigriffey]

if you can get reynolds for FF that's obviously preferably since danks is a zillion times better than ejax (slow start notwithstanding). that being said, mark reynolds is totally un-ownable so getting a closer for him is a pretty good deal. i'd pull the trigger if i had to but try not to give up danks.

Agreed

[angels7777]

I'd like it better if you were getting Beachy but I guess this isn't too bad a haul for you.

Do you like Beachy better than Dempster?

[The Artful Dodger]

If you want to cut your losses and get cheap saves, I suppose this deal is OK.

[whitheadsuxs]

keep your danks

[emenewe5]

I like Danks more than Jackson, for sure. Beachy would be tempting but Danks will settle-in and become a safe, steady option for you. Reynolds has actually cut-down on his K's and I keep thinking he's going to turn out some value before it's all said and done. But, losing patience there.

Francisco's a nice arm to have but he's a couple bad outings from setting-up Rauch the rest of the year. And I hate trading for CL's!

I'd stay put probably.

[kidsilk]

I wouldn't do it actually. I would rather have Danks and Reynolds.

[Forging Genius]

I don't like the danks for ejax part at all. viewtopic.php?t=431444

[brianrapp]

No. I dont even feel that explanation is necessary. thats how strong this NO is.