wrveres wrote:Why do people think Palin is even running, is this a Jon Stewart thing?
I don't think it's so much that people think she's running as it is that a lot of people want her to run. Not sure what Jon Stewart has to do with it, has he been trying to convince people she's running? I haven't watched him in a few weeks. There's almost zero chance she runs, but that doesn't keep some people from hoping.
Yesterday's speech by Obama was really his opening 2012 campaign speech, and it was brilliant strategy. He proposed enough cuts to bring a lot of moderates concerned about spending back around, while not calling for completely restructuring/dismantling entitlement programs like medicare, medicaid and social security. Republicans will be cutting off their nose to spite their face if they vote on the Ryan budget this week, especially since it's a non-starter in the Senate and would be DOA on the President's desk anyway. That vote will have a similar effect (though certainly not the same scale of impact) on many House Republicans who vote for it as the Healthcare bill had last year on Democrats. It's one thing to talk about cutting spending, it's another to answer to constituents who are worried about the future of their social security and medicare. As jfg said in his last post: even most of those who want to see spending cuts don't want to see them come in areas that affect them personally. The Ryan budget will be an albatross to Republicans in 2012, which is why most of the potential Republican presidential candidates haven't endorced it.
Palin has been dancing around the idea for a long time, mostly in an attempt to sell more books, boost ratings on her TV show, etc. It's all part of the machine that makes money for her. She gets about $100K per speaking engagement.
Also, I think people are on the right track that Obama is "beatable" in 2012. He failed to follow through on his "hopey/changey" (to quote Sarah Palin) stuff, his transparent government is a brick wall, Guantanamo is still open (and they're doing military tribunals), and overall the country is kinda blah. So he's not untouchable.
The problem is, who's going to beat him? It won't be Palin and/or Trump, because neither are going to run. It won't be Romney, because he was the architect of Obamacare 0.1 Beta. Who are the Republicans going to throw out there to beat this guy? Frankly, I don't see a single "name" that can beat him, unless McCain runs again and chooses a real VP candidate.
I can't see the Tea Party or any other third party coming up with a viable candidate, but a lot can change. That door isn't closed, it's just unlikely.
How many times does a person who doesn't affiliate themselves with a party have to be screwed over by a Democrat or a Republican before they stop voting for them? The answer is blowing in the wind.
What boggles my mind the most is not so much the people who still vote Democrat and Republican (even though it does irk me big time) but the people who devote their time and money to continue to put this crap into power. That hard work and money could be spent in thousands... no, millions of better ways. All of those volunteers who could be helping fix the problems they hold dear, or all that money that could be used to build communities but instead they devote their time to some dude with a good smile and nice public speaking skills. It's really pathetic.
knapplc wrote:Also, I think people are on the right track that Obama is "beatable" in 2012. He failed to follow through on his "hopey/changey" (to quote Sarah Palin) stuff, his transparent government is a brick wall, Guantanamo is still open (and they're doing military tribunals), and overall the country is kinda blah. So he's not untouchable.
The problem is, who's going to beat him? It won't be Palin and/or Trump, because neither are going to run. It won't be Romney, because he was the architect of Obamacare 0.1 Beta. Who are the Republicans going to throw out there to beat this guy? Frankly, I don't see a single "name" that can beat him, unless McCain runs again and chooses a real VP candidate.
I can't see the Tea Party or any other third party coming up with a viable candidate, but a lot can change. That door isn't closed, it's just unlikely.
Was Obama, in early 2007, considered a likely winner? I believe that Clinton was still considered the favorite for the nomination at this point 4 years ago.
"I do not think baseball of today is any better than it was 30 years ago... I still think Radbourne is the greatest of the pitchers." John Sullivan 1914-Old athletes never change.