Thornton for Broxton

[mkultra]

He only had 1 person tell him to do the deal. Nothing too unilateral there.

That's a fair point. The bigger point I'm getting across is that it's obnoxious and not-community-friendly to keep bumping your post to the top of the heap because you're not satisfied with the answers.

Let other people's questions have a fair shake. As someone who "respond to countless threads on this", you should know better.

[footballisbetter.com]

He only had 1 person tell him to do the deal. Nothing too unilateral there.

That's a fair point. The bigger point I'm getting across is that it's obnoxious and not-community-friendly to keep bumping your post to the top of the heap because you're not satisfied with the answers.

Let other people's questions have a fair shake. As someone who "respond to countless threads on this", you should know better.

True and WHIR usually helps too. Answer some other posts and they usually will return the favor and help you out with your questions.

[HOOTIE]

I would take Broxton just because of the age in a keeper. While i like Thornton, he has few elite years left.

[fierro33]

any suggestions?

Yeah, stop spamming the thread. People here are unilaterally telling you to take the deal. Either take that advice or don't.

Hello kind sir, i think u belong in the espn forums?

[sigriffey]

I like Broxton here. Granted, he fell out of favor with Torre. But so did A-Rod, Kemp, and a host of players he has had over the years. Mattingly seems rather steady-handed and Broxton is still a fireballer and better than the Dodgers' other options.