Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100% - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions

Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Re: Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Postby Guzman24 » Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:00 pm

Terrible veto. This trade could easily go either way.

A veto should only be used when collusion/cheating is suspected and should not be used to protect managers who make dumb deals (not the case in this one).

viewtopic.php?t=425551
Guzman24
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Fantasy ExpertMock(ing) Drafter
Posts: 5304
(Past Year: 1)
Joined: 5 Apr 2006
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Postby Seanyfever » Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:04 pm

I go my first veto ever tonight. Ridiculous. As is yours.

I am ready to hear your input!!! Click my link.
viewtopic.php?t=425560
Image
Expos... Gone, but not forgotten.
Seanyfever
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
Response Team
Posts: 6751
(Past Year: 289)
Joined: 6 Apr 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Enjoying America's Pastime with a Canadian Beer!

Re: Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Postby billycent » Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:18 pm

After a lengthy discussion on the message board last night w/several owners, including the commish. This trade was re-submitted and will be allowed.
billycent
Minor League Mentor
Minor League Mentor

User avatar

Posts: 853
Joined: 9 May 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Postby bobnerns » Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:17 pm

jwfizzle wrote:Trades should only be Vetoed when there is obvious Cheating!

Can you please tell this to my league! Almost everything in my league gets vetoed and it's ridiculous.

I would not have vetoed this trade, but coming from a league where most trades are vetoed, I can definitely see why it was. It can be argued that Alex Rios is not much better than BJ Upton and Ubaldo is a significant improvement over the combo of Danks and Gonzalez. Yes Ubaldo was not great in the 2nd half, but his 1st half utter dominance shows he's capable of top 5 pitching.

Help with mine?
viewtopic.php?t=425545
bobnerns
College Coach
College Coach


Posts: 326
Joined: 22 Apr 2010
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: Should this trade have been vetoed... WHIR 100%

Postby Joscellin » Mon Mar 28, 2011 11:24 pm

bobnerns wrote:
jwfizzle wrote:Trades should only be Vetoed when there is obvious Cheating!

Can you please tell this to my league! Almost everything in my league gets vetoed and it's ridiculous.

I would not have vetoed this trade, but coming from a league where most trades are vetoed, I can definitely see why it was. It can be argued that Alex Rios is not much better than BJ Upton and Ubaldo is a significant improvement over the combo of Danks and Gonzalez. Yes Ubaldo was not great in the 2nd half, but his 1st half utter dominance shows he's capable of top 5 pitching.

Help with mine?
viewtopic.php?t=425545



That's a whole lot of speculation to arrive at some justification to veto a trade.

The only leagues I really participate in allow voting on trades, but enough votes only opens the trade to review and discussion, with comish getting ultimate ruling. If the participants can justify the trade from both sides, it should always go through.
Joscellin
Softball Supervisor
Softball Supervisor


Posts: 45
Joined: 20 Mar 2011
Home Cafe: Baseball

Previous

Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests

cron
Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Saturday, Oct. 25
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Kansas City at San Francisco
(8:07 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact