I've been studying BABIP, or batting average on balls in play calculated as (H - HR)/(AB - HR - K + SF), and I was thinking it would be quite possible to create your own metric based on the types of categories in your fantasy league.
For instance, we're going to play head-to-head one win category (e.g., you win as many categories as possible to win the week). Our offensive categories will be:
Runs (R), Hits (H), Doubles (2B), Triples (3B), Home Runs (HR), Runs Batted In (RBI), Stolen Bases (SB), Walks (BB), Strikeouts (K), Batting Average (AVG)
So based on that, I came up with my own metric to consider the categories we'll use in our league as follows:
(R+H+2B+3B+HR+RBI+SB)/(AB-BB+K)
Using this formula, I get the following as the top 25:
Hitter Score BABIP ============================ Albert Pujols 0.809 0.297 Miguel Cabrera 0.796 0.336 Joey Votto 0.741 0.361 Justin Morneau 0.737 0.385 Kevin Youkilis 0.736 0.327 Josh Hamilton 0.726 0.390 Jose Bautista 0.718 0.233 Troy Tulowitzki 0.715 0.327 Joe Mauer 0.696 0.348 Carlos Gonzalez 0.688 0.384 Dustin Pedroia 0.682 0.291 Carl Crawford 0.681 0.342 Nelson Cruz 0.676 0.348 Coco Crisp 0.676 0.307 Robinson Cano 0.671 0.326 Matt Holliday 0.670 0.331 Mags Ordonez 0.668 0.313 Jim Thome 0.666 0.310 Brett Gardner 0.664 0.340 Aubrey Huff 0.660 0.303 Paul Konerko 0.658 0.326 Hanley Ramirez 0.657 0.327 Rafael Furcal 0.651 0.338 Chase Utley 0.648 0.288 Jayson Werth 0.647 0.352 Evan Longoria 0.647 0.336
I'm just wondering what other people think of this approach and feel free to poke flaws in my formula if you think there's a better way to calculate based on these stats.
1) BABIP is a stat generally used to measure how lucky a player is, while this seems to try to quantify how valuable a payer is to have on your team, so I don't really see how this is like BABIP. However, it can still be useful, ust not for the same purpose of BABIP.
2) Taking my previous point into account, it's a good start, but you need to take into account the scarcity of some of the statistics. For example, there are far fewer triples hit than doubles. Therefore, you shouldn't have a double be worth the same amount as a triple, which you do in your formula. Perhaps try to add some kind of coefficients to add a weight to certain statistics.
True...this is more just in the spirit of BABIP, as that's what gave me the idea to create my own statistical indicator.
Yeah, I thought of that too, as you said, where things like Triples would not really represent that much, but in our categories it won't really matter because we're not using points, it's just you either win or lose the category and thus all categories are equal. I'll have to see if I could normalize it somehow.
That said, the same familiar names you see on any draft list seem to roll to the top with a couple of surprises.
locutusut wrote:True...this is more just in the spirit of BABIP, as that's what gave me the idea to create my own statistical indicator.
Yeah, I thought of that too, as you said, where things like Triples would not really represent that much, but in our categories it won't really matter because we're not using points, it's just you either win or lose the category and thus all categories are equal. I'll have to see if I could normalize it somehow.
That said, the same familiar names you see on any draft list seem to roll to the top with a couple of surprises.
Well, categories aren't equal even in roto-style H2H leagues. 15 HR win it for you in a week probably 85% of the time, but 15 hits will almost never beat your opponent. Therefore, 15 HR are worth more than 15 hits.
Also, the variation in triples year to year make it so there's only like 5 players you can reliably draft for triples: Reyes, Crawford, Granderson, Victorino, Span, and Drew. Everyone else that's high up on the triples leaderboard had like 14 one year and like 5 the next. With numbers that are always that low, there's a lot of variation and low predictability, so when drafting and making projections, you shouldn't take triples into account that much except for those top 5 players.
Also, if you go to http://baseballmonster.com, go to "League Settings" up at the top, and change the settings to match your league, it will spit out an accurately weighed rankings list for your league.
Rocinante2: you know Rocinante2: its easy to dismiss the orioles as a bad team ofanrex: go on Rocinante2: i'm done Rocinante2: lmao
Neato Torpedo wrote:Also, if you go to http://baseballmonster.com, go to "League Settings" up at the top, and change the settings to match your league, it will spit out an accurately weighed rankings list for your league.
You're such a killjoy. He was ready to boldly go where no saber-fantasy-freak has gone before and you have to up and pee in his cornflakes with this "there's already a great tool for that" shizz. Yeesh.