LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question - Fantasy Baseball Cafe 2014 Fantasy Baseball Cafe
100% Deposit Bonus for Cafe Members!

Return to Baseball Leftovers

LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Moderator: Baseball Moderators

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby Matthias » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:45 am

jake_twothousandfive wrote:I haven't looked at this very closely at all. But I find it strange that it gives out negative values to the worst players.

If you're in a 10-man league with 26 roster spots then the 260th best guy in your format is worth exactly $1 (or whatever your minimum bid is). If you ask LPP to give you the best 300 or best 400 guys then everyone under #260 will be worth less than $1 because you're replacing someone with better stats with them. Therefore, they have negative (and negative dollar) value.

If you drafted Kyle Blanks last year, and kept him on your squad the whole year, for example, then you would've been much much better off not having him and taking someone who produced like the 260th best player under your format.
0-3 to 4-3. Worst choke in the history of baseball. Enough said.
Matthias
General Manager
General Manager


Posts: 4860
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby jake_twothousandfive » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:54 am

Matthias wrote:
jake_twothousandfive wrote:I haven't looked at this very closely at all. But I find it strange that it gives out negative values to the worst players.

If you're in a 10-man league with 26 roster spots then the 260th best guy in your format is worth exactly $1 (or whatever your minimum bid is). If you ask LPP to give you the best 300 or best 400 guys then everyone under #260 will be worth less than $1 because you're replacing someone with better stats with them. Therefore, they have negative (and negative dollar) value.

If you drafted Kyle Blanks last year, and kept him on your squad the whole year, for example, then you would've been much much better off not having him and taking someone who produced like the 260th best player under your format.

So it's just projecting them to be below replacement level players. Makes sense.
Image
"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us." ---Kirby Puckett
jake_twothousandfive
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar
CafeholicCafe WriterWeb Supporter
Posts: 4264
Joined: 22 Oct 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby Matthias » Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:54 am

jake_twothousandfive wrote:
Matthias wrote:
jake_twothousandfive wrote:I haven't looked at this very closely at all. But I find it strange that it gives out negative values to the worst players.

If you're in a 10-man league with 26 roster spots then the 260th best guy in your format is worth exactly $1 (or whatever your minimum bid is). If you ask LPP to give you the best 300 or best 400 guys then everyone under #260 will be worth less than $1 because you're replacing someone with better stats with them. Therefore, they have negative (and negative dollar) value.

If you drafted Kyle Blanks last year, and kept him on your squad the whole year, for example, then you would've been much much better off not having him and taking someone who produced like the 260th best player under your format.

So it's just projecting them to be below replacement level players. Makes sense.

In short and sweet, yah.
0-3 to 4-3. Worst choke in the history of baseball. Enough said.
Matthias
General Manager
General Manager


Posts: 4860
Joined: 16 Mar 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby CBMGreatOne » Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:00 pm

60 dollars for Albert Pujols is absolutely not overvalued.

If I could spend 60 dollars on 3 players and know for sure that they would all be top 10 overall players, I could field a winning team by finding just enough bargains with my remaining 120.

Last year if I drafted Albert, MCab, and Halladay, I probably could have fielded a winning team, and certainly would have fielded a top 3 team, with just about anybody else.

Some people go into drafts thinking "I really don't want to have any holes in my lineup." They divide their budget, spend conservatively, and end up with a roster that doesn't have any stars. It's happened to me before.

I don't care about having holes in my starting lineup. My feeling is that in all but the deepest of leagues, I'll find a way to fill any given hole. I strongly believe in stars and scrubs, because when you consider how close a lot of the players in the 75-150 positions on the player rater are to replacement level when you really get down to it, a lot of people undervalue those guys that represent true outliers.
CBMGreatOne
General Manager
General Manager

User avatar

Posts: 3166
(Past Year: 89)
Joined: 30 May 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby kaiser » Sun Feb 27, 2011 12:49 pm

CBMGreatOne wrote:60 dollars for Albert Pujols is absolutely not overvalued.

If I could spend 60 dollars on 3 players and know for sure that they would all be top 10 overall players, I could field a winning team by finding just enough bargains with my remaining 120.

Last year if I drafted Albert, MCab, and Halladay, I probably could have fielded a winning team, and certainly would have fielded a top 3 team, with just about anybody else..


It all seems so easy. Why do we even bother discussing it?

Seriously, though, I am a believer in stars and scrubs, too. Maybe I am undervaluing Pujols, but as I said before, the point is moot for me, since he belo gs to someone else in my keeper.
Image
kaiser
Hall of Fame Hero
Hall of Fame Hero

User avatar
EditorCafeholicCafe Ranker
Posts: 5550
(Past Year: 321)
Joined: 8 Mar 2005
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Genco Olive Oil Co.

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby justinA » Sun Feb 27, 2011 4:04 pm

jake_twothousandfive wrote:I haven't looked at this very closely at all. But I find it strange that it gives out negative values to the worst players.

Why? There are players out there that are technically worth negative money. If a player contributes so little to the team, yet takes up a roster spot then he has a negative value. On my spreadsheet in which I calculate my own values, I just add an IF function to show $0 if the formula spits out a negative number, but that is just for aesthetics. There has to be a way to differentiate between $1 players and negative numbers is the only way to go.
The Oreos!
justinA
Major League Manager
Major League Manager

User avatar

Posts: 1013
Joined: 9 Jun 2003
Home Cafe: Baseball

Re: LastPlayerPicked.com values: A Question

Postby footballisbetter.com » Fri Mar 04, 2011 11:53 pm

wrveres wrote:in a 10 team league. Sure why not?
the wire will be full of valuable 1 dollar pitchers and outfielders. Heck you could do a pitching staff of one ace, two closers, and some quality 1.00 pitchers for around 50 bucks and keep your staff in the top three. easy peasey. ;-)


I agree with this 100% In small leagues like this, the stars and scrubs is by far the best way to go. Their will be plenty of solid $1 players and WW options.
footballisbetter.com
General Manager
General Manager


Posts: 2553
(Past Year: 154)
Joined: 4 Mar 2009
Home Cafe: Baseball

Previous

Return to Baseball Leftovers

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

Forums Articles & Tips Sleepers Rankings Leagues


Today's Games
Thursday, Jul. 31
(All times are EST, weather icons show forecast for game time)

Chi White Sox at Detroit
(1:08 pm)
Colorado at Chi Cubs
(2:20 pm)
St. Louis at San Diego
(3:40 pm)
Philadelphia at Washington
(7:05 pm)
Seattle at Cleveland
(7:05 pm)
LA Angels at Baltimore
(7:05 pm)
Cincinnati at Miami
(7:10 pm)
indoors
Toronto at Houston
(8:10 pm)
Minnesota at Kansas City
(8:10 pm)
Pittsburgh at Arizona
(9:40 pm)
Atlanta at LA Dodgers
(10:10 pm)

  • Fantasy Baseball
  • Article Submissions
  • Privacy Statement
  • Site Survey 
  • Contact