I can keep either of these two starting pitchers, and I am frankly stumped given the large upside for both of them. Even though Hamels had the better season last year, I feel the best is yet to come from Hanson.
What do you guys think? As always, I'll answer any of yours - just post a link.
Thanks.
"One of the teams represents truth, justice, the American way, and underdogs everywhere. The other represents George Steinbrenner!" - U.S. News and World Reports columnist John Leo on the difference between the Mets and the Yankees.
For a split second I read this as "Tommy Hunter or Cole Hamels" and I almost flipped out, haha.
Cole had a sneaky good finish to last season--we're talking top lefty in the majors good. He had a good offseason and is definitely primed to show that he is just as valuable in that rotation as anyone else. I'd bank on Cole taking his game to another level just to show he belongs.
Tommy is great, there's no doubt about it--but I think Cole is ranked lower than he should be on ESPN.
(In reference to an Aaron Hill for David Price swap)
twinkypoop wrote:
mpieco wrote: You're my new hero if that gets accepted.
Hamels had a much better year than stats indicated....Hanson has a bunch of upside, but I'd go Hamels, esp with that lineup in Philly....and the best rotation in baseball.
Tommy Hanson scares me a bit, reminds me of Kevin Millwood. I like Big Red, but give me Hamels for this year, and if you can keep them past this year+ and then Id go with Hanson.
Redmond_Square wrote:Tommy Hanson scares me a bit, reminds me of Kevin Millwood. I like Big Red, but give me Hamels for this year, and if you can keep them past this year+ and then Id go with Hanson.
How does he remind you of Millwood?
Smells Like Teen Spirit
HOOTIE
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 14815
(Past Year: 551)
Joined: 12 Jan 2003
Bases this season: 4,236
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: Pearl Jam country, right next door to Nirvana, Soundgarden, and Alice in Chains.