You make the call! (WHIR)

[Holein1]

In our league if we get a couple objections to a trade we post it on this site to see if this is a vetoable trade.

Team 1

Hanley Ramirez (2 years left as 1st round keeper contract)
6th round pick (ended up being grady sizemore)

Team 2

Troy Tulo (1 year left on 1st round keeper contract)
Linceum (2 years left on 2nd round keeper contract)

[Darth Danielus]

Not vetoable (and in my opinion, rarely is anythign vetoable without evidence of collusion - in any case, this deal isn't really even close to vetoable.)

[Andy117]

Not vetoable but I'd much rather get Tulo and Lincecum.

[raiders_umpire]

Not vetoable.

[Ernie.Whitt.]

Not even worth discussing as vetoable. Nothing wrong with it whatsoever. It just depends on the focus of the team. I usually wouldnt even consider vetoing unless there is strong reason to believe there is cheating going on... as opposed to i simply dont think a deal is balanced... and there is absolutely no reason to think there is cheating here. Even suggesting it when there is no evidence is likely to greatly irritate the people who are just trying to play the game and therefore should be avoided if you want a strong league.

Please help with mine...
viewtopic.php?t=422426