WaCougMBS wrote:Why were you so against urban and for Aqua? Mussing everything up with your lurking and then posting strange misleading things when in here? Why are you never for thedude if you think he's in that group of 3?
misleading? wow, okay. the most misleading thing i've done so far is 'lurking' and then 'posting a strange, misleading' vote for a mafia 'when in here'
i would vote for thedude if i thought it made the most sense, but it makes more sense to vote for aqua
as i've stated a thousand times already, i think we learn the most about the most people by killing aqua
and so far, the best argument i've heard against that is "well, i'm afraid we might be wrong"
but no one's actually stepped up to aqua's defense. you're just afraid for the sake of being afraid
WaCougMBS wrote:I just have to know - do you honestly think the mafia would not vote for their own, at some point on Day 2 killing of Inuk to make sure they didn't have both guys in a pool of 3?
why do you think i started looking at the votes like i did. what i found was something that went against the null hypothesis. that can happen from time to time
WaCougMBS wrote:Tell me how it makes sense to have no mafia votes on a Day 2 mafia lynch victim and if it actually makes sense I'm happy to listen...
i don't think it makes sense. at all. in fact, it flies in the face of what i expected to prove when i set out to make the post i linked to.
i think things didn't go as those guys planned for them to go and they got caught with their pants down
or i think you've been orchestrating it from the beginning
which i don't want to believe, because then i would have to rethink everything, and i don't feel like doing that
WaCougMBS wrote:it looks like it'll stand at 3 votes for you right now anyway...
obvious statement is obvious but thanks for making sure we all know that - again
anywho, i just talked a guy out of voting for the person i want lynched.
my mafia tactics are going great, aren't they?