kimchi_chigae wrote:Nice buy low for the O's. And they didn't have to give up Tillman.
Does this change Reynolds value at all?
I think it goes down a touch, but it's nice that he's coming from a division that already had strong pitching.
It's like you don't even pay attention anymore...if we've learned one thing over the years it's that the NL West doesn't have good pitching, just poor hitting and pitchers' parks.
More like overrated pitching, because of poor hitting and pitchers' parks.
lastingsgriller wrote:I think Mark Reynolds will strikeout a lot this year.
Wow. Talk about putting your rep on the line. Why not pick a safer topic like why you shouldn't take Hanley Ramirez in the top 5.
fa·ce·tious [fuh-see-shuhs] –adjective 1. not meant to be taken seriously or literally: a facetious remark. 2. amusing; humorous. 3. lacking serious intent; concerned with something nonessential, amusing, or frivolous: a facetious person.
AquaMan2342 wrote:Sucks for baseball to see Toronto and Baltimore both building solid baseball teams that won't contend because of the division they're in.
AquaMan2342 wrote:Sucks for baseball to see Toronto and Baltimore both building solid baseball teams that won't contend because of the division they're in.
Someone get menyak on the line. mweir is hacking accounts!
AquaMan2342 wrote:Sucks for baseball to see Toronto and Baltimore both building solid baseball teams that won't contend because of the division they're in.
To be fair, the Orioles wouldn't contend no matter what division they were in.
AquaMan2342 wrote:Sucks for baseball to see Toronto and Baltimore both building solid baseball teams that won't contend because of the division they're in.
To be fair, the Orioles wouldn't contend no matter what division they were in.
Perhaps....but with a solid offensive lineup and Matusz blossoming they at least have the potential to field a good team in the next couple years.