Fenway Punk wrote:Agreed. In the first one you can tell that she's intentially making her goddess bounce, whereas the second photo I think she was just bouncing around. *snicker*
So yeah, I'm declaring that Hanley has become a risky pick. In the first round, I want guareenteed first round numbers, not potentially the best "postion numbers"
Truth be told, most of the first rounders this past year didn't produce up to their first round value. That's just the thing with first rounders: you don't get that much value for taking them there. Only because they're a steady bet to produce well enough to be considered a top 20-30 player, do you take them in the first round. Reliability to produce well and the upside to do a little more than that.
After all, leagues aren't won and lost in the first round. I'd still take Hanley as a top 3 pick, no question. He's a great bet to give a line that's worthy of 2nd round production, at the least, for scarce position. Still has the upside to best that too.