theplayer11 wrote:darn, was hoping that was not the case..looks like 2nd place to me.
Logically though, in ROTO, if one owner didn't meet in gets a zero, it would make sense to bump everyone else up. If he was ranked 10 out of 12 and drops to zero, shouldn't the #9 guy move to a 10 score? What the owner did affected everyone else.
The logic in it is that other owners should not benefit bacause someone did not meet minimum innings. In your example, some owners would gain a point and some would not. That would not be fair. The fair way is that no one moves up in the standings.