Latos has the lower ERA and WHIP this year, though Liriano's rocking a lower FIP and is undeniably the better pitcher when one looks at peripherals (higher K rate, higher GB rate, more swinging strikes, etc.).
Both of them are huge bargains for next season -- Liriano was a 19th round draft pick, and Latos a 23. I would have two more years (2012, 2013 options) on each.
My concern is that Liriano is a big injury risk, and that I can't rely on him to be healthy. Latos pitches in such a great home park, and is so young, that he could be one of the NL West's most dominant pitchers (along with Lincecum, Kershaw, and Ubaldo) for the next three seasons.
freeling_prideful wrote:My concern is that Liriano is a big injury risk, and that I can't rely on him to be healthy. Latos pitches in such a great home park, and is so young, that he could be one of the NL West's most dominant pitchers (along with Lincecum, Kershaw, and Ubaldo) for the next three seasons.
Latos for sure. He's only in his 2nd season and his #'s are astounding. He brings more to the table than Liriano - great stats in all categories. He's also a better control pitcher which I think is key to success.
I'd lean towards Latos as he is younger and there is just too much risk involved with Liriano, although that ceiling is very tempting. I'd lean towards Latos with that ballpark and weaker NL West as the deciding factors.