Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by ghosty » Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:43 pm
tried to trade adam jones and carlos zambrano for felix hernandez. but the commish declned it. its a 12 team h2h points league. Do you agree that this is a trade that should be vetoed?
-
ghosty
- College Coach

- Posts: 178
- (Past Year: 5)
- Joined: 1 May 2009
- Bases this season: 33
- Home Cafe: Football
by water boy » Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:54 pm
is this a keeper league dynasty if its a one yr league i would have let it pass, its kinda close but king felix is only giving you k's whip era.
-
water boy
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 1469
- (Past Year: 4)
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003
- Bases this season: 56
- Home Cafe: Football
- Location: SF.CA.
by theinflatinator91 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:00 pm
Seems like a good trade to me. I would not have vetoed this.
Help with mine please
viewtopic.php?t=417967
-
theinflatinator91
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 377
- Joined: 13 Feb 2009
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by ghosty » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:42 pm
No. its not a keeper league. i thought it should not have been vetoed also , thats why i posted cause i wanted to see if iam the only one.
adam jones alone almost has the same amount of points felix does for the season......
-
ghosty
- College Coach

- Posts: 178
- (Past Year: 5)
- Joined: 1 May 2009
- Bases this season: 33
- Home Cafe: Football
by water boy » Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:51 pm
its an ok deal, since its not a keeper
-
water boy
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 1469
- (Past Year: 4)
- Joined: 16 Jul 2003
- Bases this season: 56
- Home Cafe: Football
- Location: SF.CA.
by Mashug » Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:56 am
No way that should be vetoed. I've been commish in several leagues and don't feel I have the right to determine if a trade is exactly even. A trade should only be rejected if there's collusion, or someone's taking advantage of a newbie. If it were Jones and Zambrano for Wainright or Pujols, that's reaks of foul play. This doesn't
-
Mashug
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 597
- Joined: 25 Apr 2006
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Oatsdad » Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:42 am
No collusion = no veto = the commish is too active...
-
Oatsdad
- Major League Manager

- Posts: 1295
- (Past Year: 1)
- Joined: 24 Dec 2006
- Bases this season: 3
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Singles » Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:15 am
I would not not have vetoed this. This trade isn't awful and as an above poster stated if no collusion is involved it should go through.
viewtopic.php?t=418008
-
| Singles |  |
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 1472
- (Past Year: 8)
- Joined: 24 Apr 2005
- Bases this season: 16
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: New York
by rockchalk » Sat Aug 07, 2010 12:42 pm
Oatsdad wrote:No collusion = no veto = the commish is too active...
+1
Help with mine? Thanks.
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=418011&p=3309557#p3309557
-
rockchalk
- Minor League Mentor


- Posts: 567
- Joined: 24 Jan 2003
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by MadDog36 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:25 pm
Not a horrible trade, that should have been allowed. I agree that Zambrano sucks but Adam Jones is not a slouch.
The best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be!
-
MadDog36
- Hall of Fame Hero





- Posts: 13394
- (Past Year: 2687)
- Joined: 1 Jun 2006
- Bases this season: 7,267
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: NC
Return to Draft, Trade, Keeper and Waivers Questions
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ant92, baegames, BigDix33, bluejaysfan25, Eastman19, Pythagoras, sn267537, Swept Away and 16 guests