by jake_twothousandfive » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:36 pm
Both hitting about 30 points below their career averages.
Pujols: .299 (.331 career AVG) Hanley: .282 (.312 career AVG)
Yes, they're still two of the best fantasy players out there with these averages. But it's a little surprising to see considering what we're accustomed to getting from them. Is there anything apart from the obvious (BABIP) that might be causing this?
Hanley's BA looks like it runs in cycles. 2006: .292 2007: .332 2008: .301 2009: .342 2010: .282
Next year I guess he'll be back up to .330 again.
"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us." ---Kirby Puckett
Well, people are saying that this is the year of the pitcher, which would naturally mean that hitting stats as a whole would be down. Pujols is nursing a sore calf, but hasn't he been excelling through some sort of injury his entire career?
jake_twothousandfive wrote:Both hitting about 30 points below their career averages.
Pujols: .299 (.331 career AVG) Hanley: .282 (.312 career AVG)
Yes, they're still two of the best fantasy players out there with these averages. But it's a little surprising to see considering what we're accustomed to getting from them. Is there anything apart from the obvious (BABIP) that might be causing this?
Hanley's BA looks like it runs in cycles. 2006: .292 2007: .332 2008: .301 2009: .342 2010: .282
Next year I guess he'll be back up to .330 again.
I really hate the idea that players' BA can be cyclical from year to year (i.e. they have good odd years and bad even years). If he's up to .330 next season, it'll be because he fixes some problems in his swing that have caused him to hit the fewest line drives and the most grounders of his career (GB rate in 2010 is 10% higher than his career rate).
jake_twothousandfive wrote:Both hitting about 30 points below their career averages.
Pujols: .299 (.331 career AVG) Hanley: .282 (.312 career AVG)
Yes, they're still two of the best fantasy players out there with these averages. But it's a little surprising to see considering what we're accustomed to getting from them. Is there anything apart from the obvious (BABIP) that might be causing this?
Hanley's BA looks like it runs in cycles. 2006: .292 2007: .332 2008: .301 2009: .342 2010: .282
G AB R H HR RBI BB KO SB BA 102 390 58 110 14 56 48 62 21 0.2821
Hardly anything close to "best fantasy player". Lot of guys out there (Crawford, Rios, CarGo, even Chris Young) putting up similar-or-better numbers.
What I meant was they're still very good fantasy players even without a high average. And Hanley doesn't play in the OF so it's tough to directly compare him to the players you mentioned. You have to give him credit for playing a scarce fantasy position. Unless you have a lot of shortstops ranked ahead of him, I think it's still safe to call him a very valuable player.
@ freeling_prideful Hopefully you didn't think I as actually being serious about Hanley's BA cycle. That was more of an interesting observation than anything.
"Don't take anything for granted, because tomorrow is not promised to any of us." ---Kirby Puckett