Return to Commissioner's Corner
Moderator: Baseball Moderators
by ichirosan » Thu May 27, 2010 4:48 pm
Nope... you could even argue that the team getting Heyward is getting the best side with how Beckett's been pitching.
Also, as someone else said in another thread... how can you ever buy low (and Beckett is the definition of this) if someone will veto trades at the slightest sign of "unfairness"?
-
ichirosan
- College Coach


- Posts: 151
- (Past Year: 37)
- Joined: 28 Jun 2009
- Bases this season: 104
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by Kimbos Beard » Fri May 28, 2010 10:38 am
Not close to being veto worthy.
-
Kimbos Beard
- Major League Manager



- Posts: 2063
- (Past Year: 397)
- Joined: 13 Mar 2008
- Bases this season: 1,198
- Home Cafe: Baseball
by mkultra » Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:11 pm
ichirosan wrote:Nope... you could even argue that the team getting Heyward is getting the best side with how Beckett's been pitching.
I'd absolutely be making that argument, especially in a keeper league. Heyward's looking like a legit star.
-
mkultra
- Major League Manager


- Posts: 1294
- (Past Year: 202)
- Joined: 23 Jun 2004
- Bases this season: 590
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
by converge241 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:30 pm
No veto here
"I'm the man with the ball. I'm the man who can throw it faster than F***. So that's why I'm better than anyone in the world." - Kenny Powers
-
converge241
- General Manager


- Posts: 3081
- (Past Year: 280)
- Joined: 19 Mar 2003
- Bases this season: 844
- Home Cafe: Baseball
- Location: Massachusetts
by phillyguy » Mon Jun 07, 2010 9:37 pm
not a great trade but not veto worthy
-
phillyguy
- Little League Legend

- Posts: 9
- Joined: 7 Jun 2010
- Bases this season: 0
- Home Cafe: Baseball
Return to Commissioner's Corner
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jcave24 and 1 guest