Do you people have a right to veto this trade

[AEMRICH]

Hi guys I'm the commish of a money league h2h redraft 6x6. I have been in talks with a manager the past couple of days and we finally agreed on this trade
I get
Prince Fielder
Ben Zobrist
He gets
Chris Young- OF D-Backs
Matt Garza
Johnathan Sanchez SP Giants

I feel like I truly got the better end of the deal, but in every trade I feel there is a winner and a loser. In the league I have always said no collusion no veto unless it is Pujols for Juan Pierre type of deal. The team I'm trading to needs some SP and I need the offense. Fielder is likely to turn it around but Zobrist could be a 1 year wonder! The trade sat up for 36 hours after it was accepted and nobody protested until today. Do people have a right to say this needs to be vetoed? Again I acknowledge that I got the better end of this deal IMO.

[Jenken]

no way thats vetoable, you're giving up solid players and gettinng back 1 stud and another guy who will hopefully turn it around (zobrist). But no way tahts vetable, this is no "Pujols for Pierre" type of deal

[Bonger]

Honestly, I think you are getting the better end of this one by a lot. However, it is not vetoable.

viewtopic.php?t=410486

[Dragonz]

I wouldn't veto that trade.

[giants8307]

No veto on that one. What if Sanchez keeps his ERA under 3.00 all season? Certainly possible, and would really help the other owner.

[JRAMI]

what do you mean by "you people"?

[fameb]

Im usually completely against vetoes...I feel they take the fun out of being a good gm and being able to hustle ppl with your skill. Unless it's something ridiculous like Scutaro for Pujols of course.

If I was pro veto I still don't think I would veto that. Your giving up players that are performing at a very high level. It's a classic buy low sell high.

Please help
viewtopic.php?t=410507