HldOnMgnolia wrote:It's Peavy vs. KC or Hamels vs. STL for me this week. If i sit both I probably have problems getting 40 IP...
I think I'm starting Peavy. Anyone disagree completely?
I am in the exact same boat. Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on how you look at it), my opponent has a league leading 2.XX ERA (H2H league). My ERA stands around 4.00 overall (Thanks Peavy, Hamels, Hoffman, Carmona, Kazmir...). Anyway, I'm just going to throw them both out there and lose ERA and WHIP, but hopefully secure Wins, K, K/9 and QS.
HldOnMgnolia wrote:It's Peavy vs. KC or Hamels vs. STL for me this week. If i sit both I probably have problems getting 40 IP...
I think I'm starting Peavy. Anyone disagree completely?
I'm just going to throw them both out there and lose ERA and WHIP, but hopefully secure Wins, K, K/9 and QS.
Just to point this out... I started both Hamels and Peavy and got ridiculous stats from both players. However, my ERA is north of 4.00 on the week already, thanks to Kershaw and his 45+ ERA outing. I even had Carmona go today and put up a 2.84.