Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **Guest** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:42 am

Guy agreed to trade Bonds for Luis Gonzalez, Austin Kearns and Esteban Loiaza. He needed another outfielder and had no starting pitching. Deal was all set but now (the next morning) he's gotten cold feet and has decided not to do it. I'm bummed.

by **Guest** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 12:23 pm

Don't be. In my league it would have been vetoed anyhow!

by **bsdo4ever** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 3:56 pm

Yeah no kidding, VETO. You were gettin Ripped a new one there. what were you thinking, and how did it come to him declining.

by **Xtreemes** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 4:32 pm

you should definatly thank him for changing his mind

by **Guest** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:32 pm

Really? You'd rather have those guys over Bonds? I'm surprised, Bonds is still top 10 IMO.

by **Andy1234** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:40 pm

No way that trade deserves a VETO, I would rather have the Bonds side, but I could be argued either way.

I hate it when people get all VETO happy

by **Zito is God** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 9:45 pm

No veto but I would rather have the non-Bonds side. Feel happy the guy changed his mind...

by **Dugout** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:30 pm

I can't get over how many folks think they have the right to veto a trade for anything other than collusion.

by **TheRaven** » Tue Mar 23, 2004 10:48 pm

Dugout wrote:I can't get over how many folks think they have the right to veto a trade for anything other than collusion.

*Agrees*

by **Madison** » Wed Mar 24, 2004 12:36 am

Not worth a veto, but I'd want the Bonds side.

Loaiza---Isn't worth a spot on most fantasy teams. 4+ era and 12 wins tops.
Gonzalez--One throw or swing away from the end of his season with Tommy John surgery. (torn elbow ligament)
Kearns--Should be great if he can stay healthy.

I'd take Bonds over that.

Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

Guy bailed on my trade

Guy bailed on my trade

Bummed

Who is online