Tight race except for Wins, which I doubt should be considered for purposes of the bet. Unless the bet was who will be more useful in a standard 5x5 league.
I think that's exactly what it was, though.
Edit: With the Jays losing like 12 of their last 15, they've fallen into a tie with the A's (41-42). And with the teams' schedules in the 2nd half, I'm starting to not like my chances with Aussie's bet.
mweir145 wrote:With the Jays losing like 12 of their last 15, they've fallen into a tie with the A's (41-42). And with the teams' schedules in the 2nd half, I'm starting to not like my chances with Aussie's bet.
The old schedule excuse
AussieDodger
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 11288
(Past Year: 418)
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 464
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: What do you mean, Flash Gordon approaching?
mweir145 wrote:With the Jays losing like 12 of their last 15, they've fallen into a tie with the A's (41-42). And with the teams' schedules in the 2nd half, I'm starting to not like my chances with Aussie's bet.
mweir145 wrote:With the Jays losing like 12 of their last 15, they've fallen into a tie with the A's (41-42). And with the teams' schedules in the 2nd half, I'm starting to not like my chances with Aussie's bet.
AussieDodger wrote:Oh man imagine if you were 41-42 in the AL West, you'd still be in the running.
I didn't say anything about being in the running. I said something about the remaining schedule (30+ games against the three best teams in baseball) reducing my chances of winning the bet now that the teams are tied halfway through the season.
AussieDodger wrote:Oh man imagine if you were 41-42 in the AL West, you'd still be in the running.
I didn't say anything about being in the running. I said something about the remaining schedule (30+ games against the three best teams in baseball) reducing my chances of winning the bet now that the teams are tied halfway through the season.
Oakland games left vs "difficult" teams
NYY: 6 TB: 4 BOS: 6 TEX: 13 = 29
Toronto games left vs "difficult" teams
NYY: 12 TB: 9 BOS: 12 TEX: 6 = 39
Oakland vs "easy" teams
SEA: 10 BAL: 0 CLE: 3 KC: 9 = 22
Toronto vs "easy" teams
SEA: 3 BAL: 12 CLE: 3 KC: 3 = 21
Yep 10 more hard ones has you in a bit of trouble here.
AussieDodger
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 11288
(Past Year: 418)
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 464
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: What do you mean, Flash Gordon approaching?
Second of all, you've just proven my point about the difficulty of the Jays' schedule in the 2nd half. Even 10 games over the final 80 is significant (it's 12.5% of the 2nd half) and enough to hurt my chances of winning. The Jays likely needed to be well over .500 going into the final 3 months to have a chance to beat the A's. And for a while there, I thought they would do it.
Anyway, I don't see why you've made this into an issue of contention here. I wasn't making excuses, I was commenting on the reality of the situation at this point. It's looking less and less good for the 3rd year in a row.
*ExW-L and ExWP are derived from Bill James' Pythagorean theorem of baseball: Runs scored [squared] / (Runs scored [squared] + runs allowed [squared]). This formula was designed to relate a team's runs scored and runs allowed to its won-lost record.
If I was dropping anyone off that list it would be Boston. They are +69 runs for and against, where as Texas are +79. I don't need any third order shenanigans to tell me that.
mweir145 wrote:Second of all, you've just proven my point about the difficulty of the Jays' schedule in the 2nd half. Even 10 games over the final 80 is significant (it's 12.5% of the 2nd half) and enough to hurt my chances of winning. The Jays likely needed to be well over .500 going into the final 3 months to have a chance to beat the A's. And for a while there, I thought they would do it.
Yes we are in agreement that Toronto has a more difficult 2nd half
mweir145 wrote:Anyway, I don't see why you've made this into an issue of contention here. I wasn't making excuses, I was commenting on the reality of the situation at this point. It's looking less and less good for the 3rd year in a row.
I just like busting your chops if you sound excuse-y
AussieDodger
Hall of Fame Hero
Posts: 11288
(Past Year: 418)
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Bases this season: 464
Home Cafe: Baseball
Location: What do you mean, Flash Gordon approaching?
AussieDodger wrote:If I was dropping anyone off that list it would be Boston. They are +69 runs for and against, where as Texas are +79. I don't need any third order shenanigans to tell me that.
ESPN's EXPWP there doesn't account for strength of schedule like BP's 3rd order standings or BtB's rankings do. Texas has a great run differential, but they've done it against considerably worse opponents than NYY/BOS/TAM have. If we're going to be comparing teams, we should use the most accurate methods possible.
I just like busting your chops if you sound excuse-y
I've noticed, haha. But that was more of a rant of frustration than anything.