PapelbonBLEWit wrote:Yeah the point was to get Aussie Dodger to stop posting idiotic drivel. This is about the 4th separate thread that I have seen him talking trash about the Mets and it is completely unproductive. I figured if I pointed out that his team is just as big of a failure, then maybe he would stop polluting other threads.
I'm going to change my name to "2004YanksChoked" - is that cool?
PapelbonBLEWit wrote:Yeah the point was to get Aussie Dodger to stop posting idiotic drivel. This is about the 4th separate thread that I have seen him talking trash about the Mets and it is completely unproductive. I figured if I pointed out that his team is just as big of a failure, then maybe he would stop polluting other threads.
He trash talks all non-A's teams it isn't just the Mets. You need some thicker skin.
Still doesn't explain your lack of basic knowledge of US history. And if you grew up a Yanks fan, one would think the Mets would at least be in your periphery. And as a baseball fan who was born or not, that is one of the most interesting seasons to talk about. That team was electric and bad, like Pistons/Knicks kind of bad boys. Bunch of badasses. I wasn't born, but I still know about the Big Red Machine and Sandy Koufax not playing on Sabbath. Who won the World Series is kind of a basic part of fandom. And the basic part of mouthing off, is if you are going to have a post like that, check the facts.
And I forget who made the point, but your username is trashtalking in and of itself.
PapelbonBLEWit wrote:Yeah the point was to get Aussie Dodger to stop posting idiotic drivel. This is about the 4th separate thread that I have seen him talking trash about the Mets and it is completely unproductive. I figured if I pointed out that his team is just as big of a failure, then maybe he would stop polluting other threads.
This is the 21st post I have seen you posting "idiotic drivel" just by your user name. AussieDodger >> PapelbonBLEWit, and by quite a far margin,too. Stop Trolling, if you got a problem with someone that actually brings knowledge to a baseball discussion.
B-Chad wrote:Pedroia's LD rate of 20% is reason to believe he'll maintain a higher BA then Cano. It should also be noted he hits more FB's then Cano, which means that even if he posts a lower HR/FB then Cano, he should come in reasonably close to Cano in HR's
PapelbonBLEWit wrote:Yeah the point was to get Aussie Dodger to stop posting idiotic drivel. This is about the 4th separate thread that I have seen him talking trash about the Mets and it is completely unproductive. I figured if I pointed out that his team is just as big of a failure, then maybe he would stop polluting other threads.
PapelbonBLEWit wrote:Yeah the point was to get Aussie Dodger to stop posting idiotic drivel. This is about the 4th separate thread that I have seen him talking trash about the Mets and it is completely unproductive. I figured if I pointed out that his team is just as big of a failure, then maybe he would stop polluting other threads.
Yoda? Is that you?
No I am the re-incarnation of the almighty one,
All hail, thee.
B-Chad wrote:Pedroia's LD rate of 20% is reason to believe he'll maintain a higher BA then Cano. It should also be noted he hits more FB's then Cano, which means that even if he posts a lower HR/FB then Cano, he should come in reasonably close to Cano in HR's
Cafe Home
Fantasy Football
Fantasy Basketball
Fantasy Hockey
by kab21 » Wed Apr 14, 2010 10:26 am 
