2010 MLB Over/Under Wins

[GiantExpectations]

Looks like 2010 is out now, here is my top 5


Arizona - under 82
Chicago WS - over 82.5 (least sure of this one)
Florida - over 81
Oakland - under 79
Seattle - over 82.5

[j24jags]

NYM winning 89 wins is really their ceiling, it could get ugly if none of the starters after Johan get much better.

Ditto

-Coming from a big Met fan

[Maris09]

Here are all the actual 2010 ones. Not sure what those others were:

Sportsbook.com

Arizona Diamondbacks Over 82 (-115)
Under 82 (-115)

Atlanta Braves Over 85.5 (-115)
Under 85.5 (-115)

Baltimore Orioles Over 76 (-115)
Under 76 (-115)

Boston Red Sox Over 94.5 (-115)
Under 94.5 (-115)

Chicago Cubs Over 83.5 (-115)
Under 83.5 (-115)

Chicago White Sox Over 82.5 (-115)
Under 82.5 (-115)

Cincinnati Reds Over 79.5 (-115)
Under 79.5 (-115)

Cleveland Indians Over 75.5 (-115)
Under 75.5 (-115)

Colorado Rockies Over 84 (-115)
Under 84 (-115)

Detroit Tigers Over 78.5 (-115)
Under 78.5 (-115)

Florida Marlins Over 81 (-115)
Under 81 (-115)

Houston Astros Over 73.5 (-115)
Under 73.5 (-115)

Kansas City Royals Over 72 (-115)
Under 72 (-115)

Los Angeles Angels Over 85 (-115)
Under 85 (-115)

Los Angeles Dodgers Over 85.5 (-115)
Under 85.5 (-115)

Milwaukee Brewers Over 80.5 (-115)
Under 80.5 (-115)

Minnesota Twins Over 84.5 (-115)
Under 84.5 (-115)

New York Mets Over 81 (-115)
Under 81 (-115)

New York Yankees Over 95.5 (-115)
Under 95.5 (-115)

Oakland Athletics Over 79 (-115)
Under 79 (-115)

Philadelphia Phillies Over 92.5 (-115)
Under 92.5 (-115)

Pittsburgh Pirates Over 69 (-115)
Under 69 (-115)

San Diego Padres Over 72.5 (-115)
Under 72.5 (-115)

San Francisco Giants Over 82.5 (-115)
Under 82.5 (-115)

Seattle Mariners Over 82.5 (-115)
Under 82.5 (-115)

St Louis Cardinals Over 87.5 (-115)
Under 87.5 (-115)

Tampa Bay Rays Over 90 (-115)
Under 90 (-115)

Texas Rangers Over 83.5 (-115)
Under 83.5 (-115)

Toronto Blue Jays Over 72.5 (-115)
Under 72.5 (-115)

Washington Nationals Over 70.5 (-115)
Under 70.5 (-115)


Don't really see any I like all that much.

[MTUCache]

CWS - 82.5
CLE - 75.5
DET - 78.5
KC - 72
MIN - 84.5

Wow... AL Central taking a beating in those numbers. Yes, it's deserving of that, but I think there's some value in there that some sharp can figure out.

The top two teams in this division may not reach 90 (haven't in a couple years), but they'll certainly break 83 and 85. In 2009 MIN/DET finished with 87/86. 2008, CWS/MIN finished 89/88. 2007, CLE/DET finished 97/88.

Feels like there must be some way you could hedge bets between MIN/CWS/DET to figure a way to get a positive out of this. (I don't think anybody has any real money on CLE or KC beating more than one of those three teams, right?) Can't imagine a season where only one team in the AL-Central breaks the .500 mark.

[Merrick65]

Those other ones are actually legit posted at the Greek.

[BronXBombers51]

Those other ones are actually legit posted at the Greek.

Yeah, the numbers I posted in the OP were up at ABCIslands. I just looked again and they've been adjusted some but are still very similar. Mets are 87 now instead of 89, Seattle 80.5 instead of 79.5, Cleveland 80 now, Colorado 81.5.

[Maris09]

That's pretty strange to have such a large disparity in numbers like that.

You could take the Mets at Under 89 and Over 81 and have a real nice shot at a middle.
Something seems off.

[Merrick65]

That's pretty strange to have such a large disparity in numbers like that.

You could take the Mets at Under 89 and Over 81 and have a real nice shot at a middle.
Something seems off.

I agree. The Greek is usually a pretty sharp book but some of those just seem too easy... I'm not one to place a wager that takes 6 months to cash anyhow, so I doubt I'll play any of 'em; but interesting nonetheless.

[Maris09]

That's pretty strange to have such a large disparity in numbers like that.

You could take the Mets at Under 89 and Over 81 and have a real nice shot at a middle.
Something seems off.

I agree. The Greek is usually a pretty sharp book but some of those just seem too easy... I'm not one to place a wager that takes 6 months to cash anyhow, so I doubt I'll play any of 'em; but interesting nonetheless.

Exactly. The Greek is sharp as they come. No way they hang some of those numbers.

I had to create a "Guest" account to view them at The Greek, and the only thing I can think if is that maybe they put those weak numbers out in the Guest section to try and lure people into creating an actual account.

[Merrick65]

That's pretty strange to have such a large disparity in numbers like that.

You could take the Mets at Under 89 and Over 81 and have a real nice shot at a middle.
Something seems off.

I agree. The Greek is usually a pretty sharp book but some of those just seem too easy... I'm not one to place a wager that takes 6 months to cash anyhow, so I doubt I'll play any of 'em; but interesting nonetheless.

Exactly. The Greek is sharp as they come. No way they hang some of those numbers.

I had to create a "Guest" account to view them at The Greek, and the only thing I can think if is that maybe they put those weak numbers out in the Guest section to try and lure people into creating an actual account.

That would be a pretty nice bait and switch if they were pulling that..

I kinda figure they know people will pile on the over for the Mariners and Rangers all the while they know the Mariners lineup and back end of the rotation is AAA and the Rangers rotation tosses BP every time out.... (I'm not an Angels fan... )