Yes but I could really care less whether or not I get one of the top 2B or top SS. Position scarcity isn't about top end options imo, it is about what you are going to be stuck with if you leave a position until late. If Utley were the only 2B worth taking in the first 15 rounds the position still wouldn't be scarce if there were a ton of viable options in round 15+.
The other problem is that 3 of your late round SS's are being drafted between 112 and 145 MDP (and Alcides will be drafted well higher than 215 in comp cafe leagues). And your late round 2B are getting drafted at 154 (not interested in Kendrick there at all), 242 and 365 (although Kelly will be drafted higher in cafe leagues). So that list isn't comparable at all.
Ok good point, looking at my sheets the comparables are actually Alcides Esocbar, Hardy, Drew and Theriot atm. I will gladly draft the SS of those bunch instead of the Kendrick's and Barmes of the world. Looking at my charts I'd say SS has more depth than 2B, 2B is more top heavy. When I look at the 11th+ 2B out there I just don't find anything exciting, I still see a lot of value in the 11th+ SS. If you desperately want top end players at your MI positions I could see going after a 2B just because of top end depth, but I don't personally think it is worth it.