Weeks in 2010

[Captain Furtah]

Weeks isn't a jerk, you guys are the jerks...

[Fade2White12]

Hi Guys,

What do you think Weeks will be like in 2010? He was a disappointment up until this year, then was on pace for a 100/22/95/23/.291 season before his injury. I know he's pretty fragile and probably will never have that kind of line, but do you think; 85/20/80/20/.275 is a realistic projection for him in 2010? He is on waivers in my keeper league and would only cost me $3 next year (I also have B Phillips who will cost about $25). I am completely out of it this year...

Thanks,

Jeff

Why not? It's true, he is fragile, but for the first time he actually performed up to his enormous potential. Keeping him for $3 is very good value. Once next year roles around, you think people will forget about how great he was early this season? I think for that price, he's worth the risk.

[Tavish]

Hi Guys,

What do you think Weeks will be like in 2010? He was a disappointment up until this year, then was on pace for a 100/22/95/23/.291 season before his injury. I know he's pretty fragile and probably will never have that kind of line, but do you think; 85/20/80/20/.275 is a realistic projection for him in 2010? He is on waivers in my keeper league and would only cost me $3 next year (I also have B Phillips who will cost about $25). I am completely out of it this year...

Thanks,

Jeff

Why not? It's true, he is fragile, but for the first time he actually performed up to his enormous potential. Keeping him for $3 is very good value. Once next year roles around, you think people will forget about how great he was early this season? I think for that price, he's worth the risk.

It's not the first time has performed up to his potential. It's also not the first time he was a jerk directly afterwards and screwed it up and brought everyone right back to the usual "is he worth it" questions.

[lastingsgriller]

viewtopic.php?t=373757&hilit=jerk

definetely a jerk... proof is in the pudding.. (i don't necessarily understand the meaning of that phrase, but we get the point)