Art Vandelay wrote:I think it has less to do with that, and more to do with the fact that a 92-year-old dying isn't exactly "news." His death has been expected for some time. Plus he died at the absolute worst time in the news cycle if you're looking for a lot of coverage.
It's possible I'm letting my personal beef with modern media bias my analysis of the situation, but I doubt it. I'm sure I'm being completely agenda-free and rational here. Really.