Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **NoSpin** » Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:48 pm

Matt Garza was offered for Francisco Cordero, Cordero owner agreed. Garza owner has been in 1st place most of the year, Cordero owner is in last (12 teams), not that it should matter.

by **SumG** » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:19 pm

I really don't see the problem here. That's a perfectly reasonable trade to me. I don't even know which side you think is getting fleeced.

by **NoSpin** » Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:32 pm

It seemed fair to me too, but it got vetoed. I feel Cordero has a touch more value than Garza, but not by such an unreasonable degree to have the deal vetoed.
In this same League, a trade of Jenks for Pierre on May 28th was approved. Also, a deal of Wainwright/Jenks/Franklin for Guererro/Thome/McCutchen 2 weeks ago was approved.

It's a 5x5 League.

by **Dan Lambskin** » Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:18 am

aboslutely no reason that should have been vetoed

by **NoSpin** » Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:38 pm

I asked the League why the trade was vetoed, 2 people who didn't vote to veto (including commish) said they didn't think it was a 100% equal deal, but didn't think it was bad enough to veto - none of the 4 people who voted to veto have said a word. Sissies. It's been two days.

by **toledomudhens** » Fri Sep 11, 2009 12:36 pm

send the trade offer again, and put a message on the board that if this trade gets vetoed, yyou will veto every single trade that goes through...... that is on of the most fairest trades i have seen.. 1 team needs wins and k's and the other needs saves.... what the hell i hate the word veto.