As this thing's wrapping up, we find ourselves wrestling with the inevitable question - who won? Like most who have been following the action, I have my favorites - both teams and individual hot chicks. But being a relatively new event here, there really aren't any concrete methods in place for quantitatively evaluating a manager's hot chick team. So I decided I'd come up with one.
Now men have been evaluating women since there have been men and women. The common 1-10 scale is most prevalent, I've also heard of a Budweiser scale (don't ask), who knows how the cavemen did it. But since we're dealing with some of the hottest chicks in the world, giving most everyone a 10 doesn't help us much. So I had the idea to subdivide the hot chick physique into categories. I'm giving a rating in each category then the scores will be added in whatever weighting seems most appropriate. And I'm being very stingy. A 10 rating would mean I can't for the life of me imagine anyone being better in that area. So far I've given one, and am considering two others. Even 9's are hard to come by.
The first area I'm evaluating is the face. Also included is hair, head, neck, etc. I find as many pictures as I can, starting with the ones posted in the pick thread, to really get a feel for what this woman looks like, ignoring everything else about her. Then I move down a bit to upper body: arms, shoulders, and of course, rack. I look only at the upper body, is it well proportioned? Good muscle tone? Good skin tone? Size of ta-tas isn't the only factor, but it sure doesn't hurt unless they're big and nasty-looking. Then I look at lower body, again ignoring everything else. Legs, hips, abs, and bum. I tend to prefer a more athletic-look, so ideally I would see a little muscle definition in the legs and abs. But sufficiently curvy where a woman should be curvy. I have two gals in this area that are at 9.5 and I'm considering bumping to 10's.
As I look over the scores I have so far, the most important one by far is face. I can overlook a less than stellar body if I have some beautiful eyes to gaze into. Then rack, and lastly the posterior. A weighting of face (10), rack(6), and a$$(4) seems to give me more or less the rankings I would predict. But I may bump face up a little more, I have some truly beautiful women falling lower than I think they ought.
So, once my evaluations are complete I can just tally up the scores and see exactly who I think has the winning team and by what margin.
I have the entire draft thus far entered into a spreadsheet, broken down by team and in order of pick. I have the columns set for each score, and a total columns which will give me the final score based on whatever weighting system I decide upon. The weights themselves are in their own fields on a different worksheet so I can very quickly rescore everyone. I have a pivot table which automatically computes finals standings by team based on the numbers entered.
I'm also toying with the idea of a bonus column. Sometimes a chick is more hot (or less hot) for reasons other than just how she looks. I think it's hot that Marisa Miller has a wicked fastball, and that Megan Fox has a girl-crush. I think it's less than hot that Christina Aguilara is such a skank. So the column is there, I just haven't used it yet.
When the draft concludes, I'll sort the list by each category to make sure the numbers are normalized. I.e. somedays I was probably more generous than others. I know after seeing Francoise Boufhal (the '10' rack btw
) every girl for the next couple days got a 2 for that category. Which will no doubt mean several more hours looking at pictures of hot chicks. Once they are as complete as I can get them I'll post my final rankings here.
If anyone else is interested in keeping score at home in a similar fashion, I have uploaded a blank copy of my spreadsheet here
. Feel free to embellish in any way that seems to give you better results. We can compare final scores here in a couple of days.