Fantasy Baseball Cafe Forums

by **jbuk** » Tue Mar 16, 2004 8:29 am

I'm with Jackal:

Nathan
Baez
Looper

by **prodpaul** » Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:24 am

dannahann wrote:Close call but I'd rank them Looper/Nathan/ /Baez. Luck permitting, Id not want to rely on any of them as anymore than my #3 closer.

Here's the "avg proj" for the 3:

Looper: 4-4/ 31SV/ 79IP/ 57K/ 3.63ERA/ 1.34WHIP
Nathan: 4-4/ 30SV/ 73IP/ 70K/ 3.74ERA/ 1.26WHIP
Baez: 4-5/ 27SV/ 74IP/ 63K/ 4.10ERA/ 1.29WHIP

That's how I would rank em.

by **gpspartans** » Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:43 am

Looper - Nathan

by **Cornbread Maxwell** » Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:49 am

dannahann wrote:Here's the "avg proj" for the 3:

Looper: 4-4/ 31SV/ 79IP/ 57K/ 3.63ERA/ 1.34WHIP
Nathan: 4-4/ 30SV/ 73IP/ 70K/ 3.74ERA/ 1.26WHIP
Baez: 4-5/ 27SV/ 74IP/ 63K/ 4.10ERA/ 1.29WHIP

Where did these projections come from? I thought Nathan had better %s than these show.

Also, for everyone who thinks Baez is a complete lock, I have one name for you: Lance Carter. Carter seems to get stuck into games where he can make a difference whether its for the win or save - kinda like Marte. Just be a bit careful in what you expect from Baez.

by **dannahann** » Tue Mar 16, 2004 9:59 am

Cornbread Maxwell wrote:
dannahann wrote:Here's the "avg proj" for the 3:

Looper: 4-4/ 31SV/ 79IP/ 57K/ 3.63ERA/ 1.34WHIP
Nathan: 4-4/ 30SV/ 73IP/ 70K/ 3.74ERA/ 1.26WHIP
Baez: 4-5/ 27SV/ 74IP/ 63K/ 4.10ERA/ 1.29WHIP

Where did these projections come from? I thought Nathan had better %s than these show.

They are just the average of the mainstream fantasy sources out there (13 sources last update 3/14)